Skip to content

Conversation

comawill
Copy link
Contributor

@comawill comawill commented Jan 9, 2023

The specification in the readme is missing the newly added (#2764) client-id part.
This PR intends to complete the specification.

Checklist

  • Add a new entry in an appropriate subdirectory of changelog.d
  • Read and follow the PR guidelines

@comawill comawill temporarily deployed to cachix January 9, 2023 14:58 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@comawill comawill temporarily deployed to cachix January 9, 2023 14:58 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@zebot zebot added the ok-to-test Approved for running tests in CI, overrides not-ok-to-test if both labels exist label Jan 9, 2023
@comawill
Copy link
Contributor Author

comawill commented Jan 9, 2023

I realized, this is wrong, will update soon

@comawill comawill temporarily deployed to cachix January 9, 2023 15:10 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@comawill comawill temporarily deployed to cachix January 9, 2023 15:10 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@comawill
Copy link
Contributor Author

comawill commented Jan 9, 2023

@pcapriotti @mdimjasevic now I'm more confident, that this reflects reality, ready for review

@@ -7,10 +7,10 @@ version ::= "v=" Integer
key-index ::= "k=" Integer (> 0)
timestamp ::= "d=" Integer (POSIX timestamp, expiration time)
type ::= "t=" ("a" | "u" | "b" | "p") ; access, user, bot, provider
tag ::= "l=" ("s" | "" (session or nothing))
tag ::= "l=" ("s" | "") ; session or nothing
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not too familiar with this syntax; what does ";" represent?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some languages use ; to indicate the a start of a comment.
I assumed it was used this way in the line 9, so so I tried to make it more consistent, because the parenthesis in line 10 seemed wrong to me

@comawill comawill requested a review from mdimjasevic January 11, 2023 11:57
Copy link
Contributor

@pcapriotti pcapriotti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@comawill comawill merged commit 2cc7f52 into develop Jan 11, 2023
@comawill comawill deleted the comawill/zauth_readme branch January 11, 2023 15:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ok-to-test Approved for running tests in CI, overrides not-ok-to-test if both labels exist
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants