Refactor code quality workflow to explicitly name checkout step and e…

[anatolyshipitz]

Code Quality Workflow Improvements

Changes

• Added explicit naming for checkout step in GitHub Actions workflow
• Configured workflow to run on pull request events (synchronize, opened, reopened) and pushes to main branch
• Set up initial linting step in the CI pipeline

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated workflow steps to include explicit names for improved clarity in the code quality checks.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes update the GitHub Actions workflow configuration by renaming the job from test to lint and adding explicit name fields to the "Checkout" and "Lint" steps in the code-quality workflow. No changes were made to the logic or execution of these steps; only the job and step names have been specified for clarity in the workflow file.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
.github/workflows/code-quality.yml	Renamed job from test to lint; added explicit name fields to "Checkout" and "Lint" steps.

Possibly related PRs

• Add code quality workflow for linting on pull requests and main branc… #1: Adds explicit step names to the checkout and lint steps in the code-quality workflow, directly related to this change.

Poem

A hop through the workflow, neat and bright,
Now each step has a name, clear in sight.
"Checkout" and "Lint"—no longer unknown,
In YAML fields, their titles are shown.
With every CI run, the rabbit will cheer,
For clarity’s here, and the steps are sincere!
🐇✨

Tip

⚡💬 Agentic Chat (Pro Plan, General Availability)

• We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments and issue comments, within and outside of PR's. This feature enhances review and issue discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments and add commits to existing pull requests.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0e2a20d and e9bdac9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/code-quality.yml (1 hunks)

---

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

.github/workflows/code-quality.yml (1)

18-18: Add newline at end of file
YAML files should end with a newline to satisfy linters and avoid parsing warnings. Please add a blank line at EOF.

🧰 Tools

🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 18-18: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 594cc60 and 0e2a20d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/code-quality.yml (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

.github/workflows/code-quality.yml

[error] 18-18: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

🔇 Additional comments (2)

.github/workflows/code-quality.yml (2)

15-16: Explicit Checkout step naming improves clarity
Including a name: Checkout makes the CI logs self‑documenting and aligns with GitHub Actions best practices for readability.

---

17-18: Add descriptive name for lint step
Naming the lint step as Lint provides immediate context in the workflow output, which aids debugging and maintenance.

🧰 Tools

🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 18-18: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)