Skip to content

Add code quality workflow for linting on pull requests and main branc… #1

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 17, 2025

Conversation

anatolyshipitz
Copy link
Collaborator

@anatolyshipitz anatolyshipitz commented Apr 17, 2025

Code Quality Workflow Implementation

Changes

  • Added GitHub Actions workflow for code quality checks
  • Implemented automated linting on pull requests and main branch pushes
  • Set up workflow triggers for:
    • Pull request events (synchronize, opened, reopened)
    • Push events to main branch

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Introduced a new GitHub Actions workflow for code quality checks, which currently includes a placeholder linting step triggered on pull requests and pushes to the main branch.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 17, 2025

"""

Walkthrough

A new GitHub Actions workflow file has been added to the repository. This workflow, named "Code Quality," is set to trigger on pull request events (synchronize, opened, reopened) and on pushes to the main branch. It defines a single job that runs on an Ubuntu environment, checks out the repository code, and executes a placeholder step labeled "Linting...". No actual linting or testing commands are implemented yet.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/code-quality.yml Added a new GitHub Actions workflow for code quality with a placeholder lint step

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant GitHub
    participant Workflow
    participant Runner

    GitHub->>Workflow: Trigger on PR or push to main
    Workflow->>Runner: Start job on ubuntu-latest
    Runner->>Runner: Checkout repository code
    Runner->>Runner: Run placeholder "Linting..." step
Loading

Poem

🐇
A workflow hops into the scene,
With "Linting..." steps so crisp and clean.
On pull or push, it springs to life,
Prepping the code for future strife.
Though real lint waits another day,
Our bunny cheers, "Hooray, hooray!"

"""

Tip

⚡💬 Agentic Chat (Pro Plan, General Availability)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments and issue comments, within and outside of PR's. This feature enhances review and issue discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments and add commits to existing pull requests.

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 793b815 and cd7c2a7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/code-quality.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/code-quality.yml

[warning] 15-15: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4

(indentation)


[error] 19-19: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)


[error] 19-19: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

killev
killev previously approved these changes Apr 17, 2025
do it

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
.github/workflows/code-quality.yml (1)

16-17: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Replace placeholder lint step with an actual linter
A placeholder echo does not enforce code quality. Consider integrating a real linter, e.g., GitHub’s Super‑Linter or a language‑specific tool:

-      - name: Lint
-        run: echo "Linting..."
+      - name: Lint with Super-Linter
+        uses: github/super-linter@v4
+        with:
+          continue-on-error: false
+          default_branch: main
🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 16-16: syntax error: expected , but found '-'

(syntax)

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/code-quality.yml (1)

18-18: Add newline at end of file & remove trailing spaces
Ensure the file ends with a newline and has no trailing spaces to satisfy YAML linting rules.

-<no newline>
+<add newline>
🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 18-18: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)


[error] 18-18: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cd7c2a7 and f4bb1e2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/code-quality.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/code-quality.yml

11-11: could not parse as YAML: yaml: line 11: did not find expected key

(syntax-check)

🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/code-quality.yml

[error] 18-18: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)


[error] 18-18: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 16-16: syntax error: expected , but found '-'

(syntax)

🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/code-quality.yml (3)

1-2: Workflow name clarity: looks good
The workflow’s name “Code Quality” is concise and descriptive.


3-8: Triggers configuration is valid
The on.pull_request and on.push events are configured correctly to run on PR lifecycle events and pushes to main.


10-13: Job declaration is correct
The test job is set to run on the latest Ubuntu runner as intended.

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

11-11: could not parse as YAML: yaml: line 11: did not find expected key

(syntax-check)

killev
killev previously approved these changes Apr 17, 2025
@anatolyshipitz anatolyshipitz requested a review from killev April 17, 2025 10:15
add newline

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@anatolyshipitz anatolyshipitz merged commit 594cc60 into main Apr 17, 2025
1 check was pending
@anatolyshipitz anatolyshipitz deleted the init_workflows branch April 17, 2025 10:19
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
.github/workflows/code-quality.yml (1)

16-17: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix YAML indentation for lint step.
The - name: Lint entry is misaligned under steps: and its run command isn’t properly indented, leading to syntax errors. Align it with the other step and indent the run key two spaces deeper than the step level.

-    - name: Lint
-      run: echo "Linting..."
+      - name: Lint
+        run: echo "Linting..."
🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 16-16: syntax error: expected , but found '-'

(syntax)

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/code-quality.yml (2)

10-13: Job naming mismatch: job is test but runs linting.
For clarity, consider renaming the job key from test to something like lint or code-quality. This will make the workflow intent more obvious at a glance.

-jobs:
-  test:
+jobs:
+  lint:
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

11-11: could not parse as YAML: yaml: line 11: did not find expected key

(syntax-check)


17-17: Add trailing newline.
Ensure the file ends with a newline to satisfy POSIX standards and YAML linting rules.

-      run: echo "Linting..."
+      run: echo "Linting..."
+
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f4bb1e2 and c4308fb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/code-quality.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/code-quality.yml

11-11: could not parse as YAML: yaml: line 11: did not find expected key

(syntax-check)

🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/code-quality.yml

[error] 16-16: syntax error: expected , but found '-'

(syntax)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/code-quality.yml (1)

1-9: Workflow triggers look correct.
The workflow is configured to run on pull request events (synchronize, opened, reopened) and pushes to main, which aligns with the stated PR objective of enforcing code quality checks at key development stages.

runs-on: ubuntu-latest

steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Check out action version.
You’re using actions/checkout@v4, but as of now the latest stable release is v3. Referencing a non-existent tag will cause the workflow to fail. Please verify the correct tag or switch to @v3.

-      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: actions/checkout@v3

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants