Add SPDX-FileCopyrightText and SPDX-FileType to source file header #291
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Arthit Suriyawongkul <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arthit Suriyawongkul <[email protected]>
Use the date from first GitHub commit Signed-off-by: Arthit Suriyawongkul <[email protected]>
goneall
approved these changes
Jan 31, 2025
Member
goneall
left a comment
goneall
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM - I also updated my IDE copyright template to use these fields
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Context
In FOSDEM 2025 SBOM side event and someone complain about source-file-level SBOM information
(in general for the whole industry, not particularly this library).
What this PR does?
SPDX-FileCopyrightTextSPDX-FileType: SOURCECopyright (c) YYYY Source Auditor Inc.whereYYYYis the first year that that file appears on the GitHub repoQuestion
Do we like to keep the full license text inside the source file header? Or it can be omitted? (we already have
SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0in the source file header and have the full license text in./LICENSEfile)See also: spdx/spdx-java-core#28