-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
Deprecate quarkus.native.resources.excludes
#50445
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -72,10 +72,10 @@ void registerKotlinReflection(final BuildProducer<ReflectiveClassBuildItem> refl | |
.builder("kotlin.collections.EmptyList", "kotlin.collections.EmptyMap", "kotlin.collections.EmptySet") | ||
.build()); | ||
|
||
nativeResourcePatterns.produce(builder().includePatterns( | ||
"META-INF/.*.kotlin_module$", | ||
nativeResourcePatterns.produce(builder().includeGlobs( | ||
"META-INF/**/*.kotlin_module", | ||
"META-INF/services/kotlin.reflect.*", | ||
".*.kotlin_builtins") | ||
"**/*.kotlin_builtins") | ||
Comment on lines
-75
to
+78
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @geoand please confirm that the new globs capture what you intended to capture with the patterns. Thanks There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I don't remember for sure, but I'm pretty sure the pattern wasn't meant to capture the files in an arbitrary depth There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Hmmm, I know for sure that There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. If this works and attempts did it, let's go ahead with it There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yeah the new patterns do what the old ones did so they are good enough IMHO. |
||
.build()); | ||
|
||
reflectiveHierarchyIgnoreWarning.produce( | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Karm please confirm that the new globs capture what you intended to capture with the patterns. Thanks