Bug in RouteBuildItem the builder has asBlockingRoute but not used internally

[psini]

Describe the bug

I spot this issue the builder of RouteBuildItem has the option asBlockingRoute but when it builds the RouteBuildItem the constructor doesn't have it's fixed to NORMAL . I suppose this is a bug that doesn't allowe to create from an extension a Blocking route using a code like :

 routes.produce(RouteBuildItem.newFrameworkRoute("/route")
                .withRequestHandler(recorder.createEndpointHandler("/route"))
                .asBlockingRoute()
                .build()); 

Expected behavior

We are able to create blocking routes from extension

Actual behavior

The asBlockingRoute is ignored at the end.

How to Reproduce?

No response

Output of uname -a or ver

No response

Output of java -version

No response

Quarkus version or git rev

No response

Build tool (ie. output of mvnw --version or gradlew --version)

No response

Additional information

No response

[geoand]

It seems to me that you are looking at a pretty old version of the code, can you confirm?

[psini]

This is the latest on master https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus/blob/main/extensions/vertx-http/deployment-spi/src/main/java/io/quarkus/vertx/http/deployment/spi/RouteBuildItem.java

[geoand]

Ah okay, I was looking at io.quarkus.vertx.http.deployment.RouteBuildItem

[geoand]

Indeed this look like a bug. Would you like to contribute a fix?

[psini]

Let me check i found that using io.quarkus.vertx.http.deployment.RouteBuildItem it works fine. Could it be that https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus/blob/main/extensions/vertx-http/deployment-spi/src/main/java/io/quarkus/vertx/http/deployment/spi/RouteBuildItem.java should be deprecated because is now we have to use the first?

[geoand]

Not really, the two classes serve different purposes. This should be used by extensions that need to expose a Route, the other one is internal to Quarkus.