Update opentelemetry npm packages

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Confidence
@opentelemetry/api-logs (source)	0.57.2 -> 0.203.0
@opentelemetry/exporter-logs-otlp-grpc (source)	0.57.2 -> 0.203.0
@opentelemetry/exporter-metrics-otlp-grpc (source)	0.57.2 -> 0.203.0
@opentelemetry/exporter-metrics-otlp-http (source)	0.57.2 -> 0.203.0
@opentelemetry/exporter-metrics-otlp-proto (source)	0.57.2 -> 0.203.0
@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-grpc (source)	0.57.2 -> 0.203.0
@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-http (source)	0.57.2 -> 0.203.0
@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-proto (source)	0.57.2 -> 0.203.0
@opentelemetry/instrumentation (source)	0.57.2 -> 0.203.0
@opentelemetry/instrumentation-express (source)	0.47.1 -> 0.52.0
@opentelemetry/instrumentation-graphql (source)	0.47.1 -> 0.51.0
@opentelemetry/instrumentation-http (source)	0.57.2 -> 0.203.0
@opentelemetry/sdk-logs (source)	0.57.2 -> 0.203.0
@opentelemetry/sdk-node (source)	0.57.2 -> 0.203.0
@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions (source)	1.30.0 -> 1.36.0

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

open-telemetry/opentelemetry-js (@​opentelemetry/api-logs)

v0.203.0

Compare Source

v0.202.0

Compare Source

v0.201.1

Compare Source

v0.201.0

Compare Source

v0.200.0

Compare Source

open-telemetry/opentelemetry-js-contrib (@​opentelemetry/instrumentation-express)

v0.52.0

Compare Source

Features

• deps: update deps matching '@​opentelemetry/*' (#​2930) (e4ab2a9)

Dependencies

• The following workspace dependencies were updated
  • devDependencies
    • @​opentelemetry/contrib-test-utils bumped from ^0.48.0 to ^0.49.0

v0.51.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

• deps: update all patch versions (#​2832) (e45605d)
• express: Ensure 404 routes don't attach route attribute (#​2843) (85f6398)

v0.51.0

Compare Source

Features

• deps: update deps matching '@​opentelemetry/*' (#​2871) (d33c6f2)

Dependencies

• The following workspace dependencies were updated
  • devDependencies
    • @​opentelemetry/contrib-test-utils bumped from ^0.47.0 to ^0.48.0

v0.50.0

Compare Source

Features

• deps: update deps matching '@​opentelemetry/*' (#​2828) (59c2a4c)

Dependencies

• The following workspace dependencies were updated
  • devDependencies
    • @​opentelemetry/contrib-test-utils bumped from ^0.46.0 to ^0.47.0

v0.49.0

Compare Source

Features

• instrumentation-express: add support for Express v5, take 2 (#​2801) (b3a70d7), closes #​2437 #​2435

v0.48.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

• express: span name if middleware on nested router is used (#​2682) (d579630)

v0.48.0

Compare Source

⚠ BREAKING CHANGES

• chore!: Update to 2.x and 0.200.x @​opentelemetry/* packages from opentelemetry-js.git per 2.x upgrade guide
  • The minimum supported Node.js has been raised to ^18.19.0 || >=20.6.0. This means that support for Node.js 14 and 16 has been dropped.
  • The minimum supported TypeScript version has been raised to 5.0.4.
  • The compilation target for transpiled TypeScript has been raised to ES2022 (from ES2017).
• instrumentation-express: propagate context and measure full handler spans (#​2638)

Features

• instrumentation-express: propagate context and measure full handler spans (#​2638) (353dbb0)

Bug Fixes

• deps: update otel core experimental to ^0.57.2 (#​2716) (d2a9a20)

Miscellaneous Chores

• update to JS SDK 2.x (#​2738) (7fb4ba3)

Dependencies

• The following workspace dependencies were updated
  • devDependencies
    • @​opentelemetry/contrib-test-utils bumped from ^0.45.1 to ^0.46.0

open-telemetry/opentelemetry-js-contrib (@​opentelemetry/instrumentation-graphql)

v0.51.0

Compare Source

Features

• deps: update deps matching '@​opentelemetry/*' (#​2930) (e4ab2a9)

v0.50.0

Compare Source

Features

• deps: update deps matching '@​opentelemetry/*' (#​2871) (d33c6f2)

v0.49.0

Compare Source

Features

• deps: update deps matching '@​opentelemetry/*' (#​2828) (59c2a4c)

v0.48.0

Compare Source

⚠ BREAKING CHANGES

• chore!: Update to 2.x and 0.200.x @​opentelemetry/* packages from opentelemetry-js.git per 2.x upgrade guide
  • The minimum supported Node.js has been raised to ^18.19.0 || >=20.6.0. This means that support for Node.js 14 and 16 has been dropped.
  • The minimum supported TypeScript version has been raised to 5.0.4.
  • The compilation target for transpiled TypeScript has been raised to ES2022 (from ES2017).

Bug Fixes

• deps: update otel core experimental to ^0.57.2 (#​2716) (d2a9a20)

Miscellaneous Chores

• update to JS SDK 2.x (#​2738) (7fb4ba3)

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_extra_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 10002	$$97.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 520 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.243 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$5.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.107 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 5001	$$77.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 392 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 27604	$$285 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.04 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-1.166 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$20.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 199 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.873 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 13450	$$227 \mathrm{ms} \pm 736 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.794 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 11308	$$494 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.85 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}6.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$6.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.348 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 5628	$$89.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 494 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.761 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$28.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 136 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.448 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.52 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$13.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 105 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.893 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$39.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 326 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.416 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$15.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 106 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.46 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$25.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 241 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$29.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 171 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.072 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$14.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.479 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.964 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 38.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.46 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.61 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.72 \mathrm{ms} \pm 62.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.41 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.929 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.52 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.141 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.631 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.622 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.103 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.509 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.885 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.062 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.568 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.525 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$2.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.180 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.390 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$2.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.098 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$2.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-73.843 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.720 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.316 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$29.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 340 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-31.537 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$31.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 297 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.359 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$30.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 259 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.706 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$30.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 262 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.958 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$29.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 315 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-32.483 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$31.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 293 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.030 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$29.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 303 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.839 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$29.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 289 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.789 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$30.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 299 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-29.037 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 34.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.078 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$107 \mathrm{ms} \pm 522 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$114 \mathrm{ms} \pm 498 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.403 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$121 \mathrm{ms} \pm 559 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.152 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$128 \mathrm{ms} \pm 503 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.270 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$136 \mathrm{ms} \pm 573 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.063 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$153 \mathrm{ms} \pm 526 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.325 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$193 \mathrm{ms} \pm 767 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.932 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$240 \mathrm{ms} \pm 822 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.075 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$253 \mathrm{ms} \pm 731 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.040 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$262 \mathrm{ms} \pm 766 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.018 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$267 \mathrm{ms} \pm 984 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.398 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$285 \mathrm{ms} \pm 838 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.147 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$53.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 150 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.263 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 417 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.730 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$255 \mathrm{ms} \pm 693 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.530 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$64.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 369 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.457 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$5.30 \mathrm{s} \pm 590 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}1343 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$14.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-23.119 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 324 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.650 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$19.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 147 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}11.9 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$14.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 51.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.365 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$21.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 121 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}18.0 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$14.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 92.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.502 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 177 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$18.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 98.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}33.7 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$19.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 101 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.221 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$21.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 200 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-32.114 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph