Skip to content

Conversation

lovelydinosaur
Copy link
Contributor

@lovelydinosaur lovelydinosaur commented Dec 31, 2019

Although this might look like an API breaking change on first sight, I think we could actually treat it as a borderline bugfix...

We're currently exposing a .cookies property on Request, but we don't do anything with it.
If a user builds a request instance explicitly, and sets items on request.cookies it won't have any effect.

I'd potentially be okay with us having a request.cookies property at some point, tho it's not neccessarily a given that we ought to. Given that it doesn't currently have the behavior users would expect from it, I think it's reasonable just to drop it outright for now.

@lovelydinosaur lovelydinosaur added the user-experience Ensuring that users have a good experience using the library label Dec 31, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@florimondmanca florimondmanca left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure! Sounds legit.

@lovelydinosaur lovelydinosaur merged commit c050480 into master Jan 1, 2020
@lovelydinosaur lovelydinosaur deleted the drop-cookies-property-on-request branch January 1, 2020 13:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

user-experience Ensuring that users have a good experience using the library

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants