Skip to content

Conversation

@jkotas
Copy link
Member

@jkotas jkotas commented May 11, 2024

No description provided.

@ghost ghost added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label May 11, 2024
@jkotas
Copy link
Member Author

jkotas commented May 11, 2024

/azp run runtime-coreclr outerloop

@dotnet dotnet deleted a comment from azure-pipelines bot May 11, 2024
@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@dotnet dotnet deleted a comment from azure-pipelines bot May 11, 2024
@dotnet dotnet deleted a comment from azure-pipelines bot May 11, 2024
return newMask;
}

//------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

}

PEReader IResolver.ResolveAssembly(AssemblyName assemblyName)
PEReader IResolver.ResolveAssembly(AssemblyNameInfo assemblyName)
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wondering why this was not caught in CI ran during PR. Is the difference just Debug vs. Release?

fail: /__w/1/s/build.sh -ci -arch arm64 -os linux -cross -s clr -c Debug 
pass: /__w/1/s/build.sh -ci -arch arm64 -os linux -cross -s clr+libs+host+packs -rc Release -c Release -lc Release   

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right, the default CI mix builds checked and release coreclr builds only. 99.9+% of debug build breaks are caught by checked builds. It is only outliers like this one (that looks like a C++ compiler bug to me) that can sneak through.

@jkotas jkotas added area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels May 11, 2024
@jkotas jkotas marked this pull request as ready for review May 11, 2024 18:42
@dotnet-policy-service
Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants