Skip to content

Conversation

@alinaliBQ
Copy link
Contributor

@alinaliBQ alinaliBQ commented Nov 4, 2025

Rationale for this change

ODBC scroll fetch implementation. This is part of advance ODBC data fetching.

What changes are included in this PR?

  • Implement SQLFetchScroll, only fetch orientation SQL_FETCH_NEXT is supported, which makes it has same effect as SQLFetch
  • Tests

Are these changes tested?

Tested in local MSVC.

Are there any user-facing changes?

N/A

@alinaliBQ alinaliBQ changed the title GH-47713: [C++][FlightRPC] WIP: ODBC scroll fetch implementation GH-47715: [C++][FlightRPC] WIP: ODBC scroll fetch implementation Nov 4, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 4, 2025

⚠️ GitHub issue #47715 has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the awaiting review Awaiting review label Nov 4, 2025
@alinaliBQ alinaliBQ force-pushed the gh-47715-sql-extended-scroll branch from e01ec17 to bc97bd2 Compare November 10, 2025 22:04
@alinaliBQ alinaliBQ changed the title GH-47715: [C++][FlightRPC] WIP: ODBC scroll fetch implementation GH-47715: [C++][FlightRPC] ODBC scroll fetch implementation Nov 10, 2025
@alinaliBQ
Copy link
Contributor Author

@lidavidm this draft PR is ready for review! Please have a look

@github-actions github-actions bot added awaiting merge Awaiting merge and removed awaiting review Awaiting review labels Dec 8, 2025
@alinaliBQ alinaliBQ force-pushed the gh-47715-sql-extended-scroll branch from 2760394 to b2919bd Compare December 8, 2025 23:23
Fix comments and use `ARROW_UNUSED`

Co-Authored-By: alinalibq <[email protected]>
- be explicit with nullptr instead of 0
@alinaliBQ alinaliBQ force-pushed the gh-47715-sql-extended-scroll branch from b2919bd to a3aa3cc Compare December 13, 2025 00:18
@jduo jduo merged commit 4fc9f9e into apache:main Dec 15, 2025
41 of 44 checks passed
@jduo jduo removed the awaiting merge Awaiting merge label Dec 15, 2025
@conbench-apache-arrow
Copy link

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 3 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 4fc9f9e.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 13 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants