Skip to content

Conversation

@lidavidm
Copy link
Member

@lidavidm lidavidm commented Mar 29, 2024

Rationale for this change

Remove runtime dependencies on Category B dependencies.

What changes are included in this PR?

  • logback: move to test-only
  • eclipse: remove dependency, vendor the Netty implementation we originally used

I wanted to remove javax.annotation.Generated but gRPC doesn't yet let us do that (grpc/grpc-java#9179). That's ~okay though since effectively that's a build only dependency.

Are these changes tested?

#40901

Are there any user-facing changes?

No.

This PR contains a "Critical Fix". License issues do not cause runtime issues but are important as an Apache project.

@lidavidm
Copy link
Member Author

@github-actions crossbow submit java

@github-actions
Copy link

Revision: 7a5ee2543fcd850374a313afb770b8f29daac1a2

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-d2d2983571

Task Status
java-jars GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-java-linux-almalinux-8-amd64 GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-java-linux-conda-latest-amd64 GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-java-linux-ubuntu-20.04-amd64 GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-java-linux-ubuntu-22.04-amd64 GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-java-macos-amd64 GitHub Actions

@lidavidm
Copy link
Member Author

CC @danepitkin @vibhatha

Copy link
Member

@danepitkin danepitkin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks for the quick fix!

@danepitkin
Copy link
Member

CI error looks unrelated.

@lidavidm
Copy link
Member Author

Oops, I think I need to update either LICENSE.txt or NOTICE to reflect the vendored code too. One sec...

Copy link
Collaborator

@vibhatha vibhatha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!
@lidavidm shall we re-run the crossbows just to make sure.

@lidavidm
Copy link
Member Author

There is still some time for feature freeze so I'll leave this for a committer to look at. I won't be able to make updates in the next couple days but should be back online by 4/2.

@assignUser
Copy link
Member

@github-actions crossbow submit java

@github-actions
Copy link

Revision: 1070ea5

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-f3f687f53c

Task Status
java-jars GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-java-linux-almalinux-8-amd64 GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-java-linux-conda-latest-amd64 GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-java-linux-ubuntu-20.04-amd64 GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-java-linux-ubuntu-22.04-amd64 GitHub Actions
verify-rc-source-java-macos-amd64 GitHub Actions

@kou kou changed the title GH-40896: Remove runtime dependencies on Eclipse, logback GH-40896: [Java] Remove runtime dependencies on Eclipse, logback Apr 2, 2024
Copy link
Member

@kou kou left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

@kou kou merged commit aaacefa into apache:main Apr 2, 2024
@kou kou removed the awaiting committer review Awaiting committer review label Apr 2, 2024
@kou kou mentioned this pull request Apr 2, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the awaiting merge Awaiting merge label Apr 2, 2024
SOFTWARE.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
java/vector/src/main/java/org/apache/arrow/vector/util/IntObjectHashMap.java
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe worth to mention in NOTICE file too.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If Netty doesn't have NOTICE contents for this file, we don't need to change our NOTICE file.
See also: https://infra.apache.org/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep

@conbench-apache-arrow
Copy link

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 6 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit aaacefa.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 5 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

@lidavidm lidavidm deleted the gh-40896 branch April 2, 2024 13:31
lriggs pushed a commit to lriggs/arrow that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2024
apache#40904)

Remove runtime dependencies on [Category B](https://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b) dependencies.

- logback: move to test-only
- eclipse: remove dependency, vendor the Netty implementation we originally used

I wanted to remove javax.annotation.Generated but gRPC doesn't yet let us do that (grpc/grpc-java#9179). That's ~okay though since effectively that's a build only dependency.

No.

**This PR contains a "Critical Fix".** License issues do not cause runtime issues but are important as an Apache project.
* GitHub Issue: apache#40896

Authored-by: David Li <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]>
@github-actions github-actions bot added awaiting changes Awaiting changes and removed awaiting merge Awaiting merge labels Apr 2, 2024
lriggs pushed a commit to lriggs/arrow that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2024
apache#40904)

Remove runtime dependencies on [Category B](https://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b) dependencies.

- logback: move to test-only
- eclipse: remove dependency, vendor the Netty implementation we originally used

I wanted to remove javax.annotation.Generated but gRPC doesn't yet let us do that (grpc/grpc-java#9179). That's ~okay though since effectively that's a build only dependency.

No.

**This PR contains a "Critical Fix".** License issues do not cause runtime issues but are important as an Apache project.
* GitHub Issue: apache#40896

Authored-by: David Li <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]>
vibhatha pushed a commit to vibhatha/arrow that referenced this pull request May 25, 2024
apache#40904)

### Rationale for this change

Remove runtime dependencies on [Category B](https://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b) dependencies.

### What changes are included in this PR?

- logback: move to test-only
- eclipse: remove dependency, vendor the Netty implementation we originally used

I wanted to remove javax.annotation.Generated but gRPC doesn't yet let us do that (grpc/grpc-java#9179). That's ~okay though since effectively that's a build only dependency.

### Are these changes tested?

apache#40901

### Are there any user-facing changes?

No.

**This PR contains a "Critical Fix".** License issues do not cause runtime issues but are important as an Apache project.
* GitHub Issue: apache#40896

Authored-by: David Li <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]>
lriggs pushed a commit to lriggs/arrow that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2024
apache#40904)

Remove runtime dependencies on [Category B](https://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b) dependencies.

- logback: move to test-only
- eclipse: remove dependency, vendor the Netty implementation we originally used

I wanted to remove javax.annotation.Generated but gRPC doesn't yet let us do that (grpc/grpc-java#9179). That's ~okay though since effectively that's a build only dependency.

No.

**This PR contains a "Critical Fix".** License issues do not cause runtime issues but are important as an Apache project.
* GitHub Issue: apache#40896

Authored-by: David Li <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]>
pribor pushed a commit to GlobalWebIndex/arrow that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2025
apache#40904)

### Rationale for this change

Remove runtime dependencies on [Category B](https://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b) dependencies.

### What changes are included in this PR?

- logback: move to test-only
- eclipse: remove dependency, vendor the Netty implementation we originally used

I wanted to remove javax.annotation.Generated but gRPC doesn't yet let us do that (grpc/grpc-java#9179). That's ~okay though since effectively that's a build only dependency.

### Are these changes tested?

apache#40901

### Are there any user-facing changes?

No.

**This PR contains a "Critical Fix".** License issues do not cause runtime issues but are important as an Apache project.
* GitHub Issue: apache#40896

Authored-by: David Li <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants