Add config to zio-schema-bson

[WesselVS]

zio-bson-magnolia has support for a configuration (in addition to annotations). We need this support in zio-schema-bson as well. Right now, I've only implemented discriminator and class name transformer support, since this is what my company needs.

[plokhotnyuk]

Hi @WesselVS,

Thank you for your contribution to the project! I appreciate the effort you've put into this pull request. I have a few suggestions to help ensure our codebase remains maintainable and evolves smoothly over time.

When dealing with configuration that may change or expand, it's generally a good idea to avoid using case classes. This is because adding new flags or options can break binary compatibility of the auto-generated methods, which would require manual fixes and potentially introduce a lot of boilerplate code, as seen here.

Instead, I recommend using a regular class with a private constructor and a builder API. This approach provides more flexibility and better supports future changes. You can find a great example of this pattern here.

If you're interested in learning more about designing libraries for easier evolution while maintaining backward binary compatibility, I highly recommend checking out this insightful talk.

Thank you again for your work, and I look forward to seeing your updates!

[WesselVS]

Hi @WesselVS,

Thank you for your contribution to the project! I appreciate the effort you've put into this pull request. I have a few suggestions to help ensure our codebase remains maintainable and evolves smoothly over time.

When dealing with configuration that may change or expand, it's generally a good idea to avoid using case classes. This is because adding new flags or options can break binary compatibility of the auto-generated methods, which would require manual fixes and potentially introduce a lot of boilerplate code, as seen here.

Instead, I recommend using a regular class with a private constructor and a builder API. This approach provides more flexibility and better supports future changes. You can find a great example of this pattern here.

If you're interested in learning more about designing libraries for easier evolution while maintaining backward binary compatibility, I highly recommend checking out this insightful talk.

Thank you again for your work, and I look forward to seeing your updates!

Hi, thanks a lot! I learned a lot from your response and the video.

[plokhotnyuk]

@WesselVS I'm happy that it was helpful!

Please peek the latest release that is already available on the Maven Central and enjoy results your work!