Skip to content

Overcoming uncertainity after scan phase by dynamically lowering accuracy threshold for self-labeling #128

@TomasPlachy

Description

@TomasPlachy

Hello,

The first batch in the first epoch usually doesn't have confident enough samples to pass the 0.99 threshold for self-labeling. But if I lower the threshold to 0.9, it negatively effects the performance of the network (I have observed that most of the samples have over 0.99 probability score in the final epochs, but the accuracy is low).

Do you have any thoughts about progressively increasing the threshold for self-labeling? Or how would you tackle this issue?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions