Skip to content

Conversation

battermann
Copy link
Contributor

@battermann battermann commented Feb 28, 2023

Checklist

  • Add a new entry in an appropriate subdirectory of changelog.d
  • Read and follow the PR guidelines

@zebot zebot added the ok-to-test Approved for running tests in CI, overrides not-ok-to-test if both labels exist label Feb 28, 2023
@battermann battermann changed the title wip Upgrade rusty-jwt-tools Feb 28, 2023
@battermann battermann force-pushed the battermann/update-rusty-jwt-tools branch from 1bc9ee4 to e5e2662 Compare March 1, 2023 14:37
@battermann battermann marked this pull request as ready for review March 1, 2023 14:44
[ test p "success" $ testCreateAccessToken b,
[ test p "invalid values" $ testCreateAccessTokenInvalidValues b,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there no happy path test possible anymore?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unfortunately not. There is no simple way to create a valid DPoP proof.

@battermann battermann merged commit 90bb016 into develop Mar 2, 2023
@battermann battermann deleted the battermann/update-rusty-jwt-tools branch March 2, 2023 08:42
lepsa pushed a commit to lepsa/wire-server that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ok-to-test Approved for running tests in CI, overrides not-ok-to-test if both labels exist
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants