Skip to content

Use local serial consistency for LWT #2251

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 1, 2022
Merged

Use local serial consistency for LWT #2251

merged 3 commits into from
Apr 1, 2022

Conversation

pcapriotti
Copy link
Contributor

@pcapriotti pcapriotti commented Mar 31, 2022 •
edited
Loading

This should avoid the use of Quorum consistency under the hood.

Checklist

  • The PR Title explains the impact of the change.
  • The PR description provides context as to why the change should occur and what the code contributes to that effect. This could also be a link to a JIRA ticket or a Github issue, if there is one.
  • changelog.d contains the following bits of information (details):
    • A file with the changelog entry in one or more suitable sub-sections. The sub-sections are marked by directories inside changelog.d.

@pcapriotti
Use local serial consistency for LWT
422ce97 
This should avoid the use of Quorum consistency under the hood.
@pcapriotti pcapriotti requested a review from jschaul March 31, 2022 07:52
jschaul
jschaul approved these changes Mar 31, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@jschaul jschaul left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@jschaul
Copy link
Member

jschaul commented Mar 31, 2022 •
edited
Loading

@akshaymankar FYI we saw errors in the logs about unable to reach quorum for PUT /clients/... requests during a one-DC-was-turned-off state in cassandra-brig.

@pcapriotti pcapriotti merged commit 8d228ea into develop Apr 1, 2022
@pcapriotti pcapriotti deleted the pcapriotti/use-local-consistency branch April 1, 2022 05:07
@zebot zebot mentioned this pull request Apr 4, 2022
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jschaul jschaul jschaul approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@pcapriotti @jschaul