[runtime/binding] support ort backend in wenetruntime #1708
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
xingchensong
requested review from
pengzhendong and
robin1001
and removed request for
robin1001
Member
Author
|
usage: |
Collaborator
|
Great job! |
robin1001
approved these changes
Feb 26, 2023
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For aarch64 systems (raspberry pi, horizonx3 pi, etc), ort backend is a better choice.
Test success on x3 pi:
TODO (in next PR, not this one):
binding/python/py/hub.py, add download for onnx modelpip install wenetruntime==v1.0.0.onnx,pip install wenetruntime==v1.0.0.torch, etc