Skip to content

refactor: types for client #5544

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 17, 2025
Merged

Conversation

alexander-akait
Copy link
Member

  • This is a bugfix
  • This is a feature
  • This is a code refactor
  • This is a test update
  • This is a docs update
  • This is a metadata update

For Bugs and Features; did you add new tests?

Motivation / Use-Case

Breaking Changes

Additional Info

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 17, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.31%. Comparing base (dd0c284) to head (5a6f742).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #5544   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   83.30%   83.31%           
=======================================
  Files          13       13           
  Lines        2037     2038    +1     
  Branches      751      751           
=======================================
+ Hits         1697     1698    +1     
  Misses        306      306           
  Partials       34       34           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@alexander-akait alexander-akait merged commit 64e4afe into master Jul 17, 2025
200 of 298 checks passed
@alexander-akait alexander-akait deleted the refactor-types-for-client branch July 17, 2025 15:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant