Skip to content

Enable ZP Support for Machete #20268

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 1, 2025
Merged

Conversation

czhu-cohere
Copy link
Contributor

@czhu-cohere czhu-cohere commented Jun 30, 2025

Essential Elements of an Effective PR Description Checklist

  • The purpose of the PR, such as "Fix some issue (link existing issues this PR will resolve)".
  • The test plan, such as providing test command.
  • The test results, such as pasting the results comparison before and after, or e2e results
  • (Optional) The necessary documentation update, such as updating supported_models.md and examples for a new model.

Purpose

The Machete kernel already support ZP so enable it in the vLLM frontend. For pre-applying the scales we follow https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/main/csrc/quantization/machete/Readme.md

Test Plan

There are already correctness test with zp in test_machete_mm.py (under AWQ style configs). We test the latency diff with/without zp (using benchmark_machete.py) and the e2e correctness (lm-eval, sanity check queries).

We tested on an internal w4a16 asym gs=128 checkpoint (using compressed-tensors) based on CohereLabs/c4ai-command-a-03-2025. The quant config is

  "quantization_config": {
    "config_groups": {
      "group_0": {
        "input_activations": null,
        "output_activations": null,
        "targets": [
          "Linear"
        ],
        "weights": {
          "actorder": "weight",
          "block_structure": null,
          "dynamic": false,
          "group_size": 128,
          "num_bits": 4,
          "observer": "minmax",
          "observer_kwargs": {},
          "strategy": "group",
          "symmetric": false,
          "type": "int"
        }
      }
    },
    "format": "pack-quantized",
    "global_compression_ratio": null,
    "ignore": [
      "lm_head"
    ],
    "kv_cache_scheme": null,
    "quant_method": "compressed-tensors",
    "quantization_status": "compressed"
  },

Test Result

Sanity check query

python3       -m vllm.entrypoints.openai.api_server       --model /root/engines/CA-w4a16-gs128-asymm/poseidon --tensor-parallel-size 1 --max-model-len 2048

curl http://localhost:8000/v1/completions     -H "Content-Type: application/json"     -d '{
        "model": "/root/engines/CA-w4a16-gs128-asymm/poseidon",
        "prompt": "San Francisco is a",
        "max_tokens": 25,
        "temperature": 0
    }'

completion w/machete

"top holiday destination featuring scenic beauty and great ethnic and cultural diversity.\n\nSan Francisco is known for nature, parks, and"

completion w/marlin

"top holiday destination featuring scenic beauty and great ethnic and cultural diversity.\n\nSan Francisco is known for nature, parks, and"

lm-eval (mmlu_pro)

machete
mmlu_pro: {'exact_match,custom-extract': np.float64(0.698969414893617), 'exact_match_stderr,custom-extract': np.float64(0.004097131976561064), 'alias': 'mmlu_pro'}

marlin
mmlu_pro: {'exact_match,custom-extract': np.float64(0.6967253989361702), 'exact_match_stderr,custom-extract': np.float64(0.004102789695366856), 'alias': 'mmlu_pro'}

latency

python3 benchmarks/kernels/benchmark_machete.py \ --act-type bfloat16 \ --group-scale-type bfloat16 \ --out-type bfloat16 \ --group-zero-type bfloat16 \model_bench

Screenshot 2025-06-30 at 1 47 45 PM

the summary is that across the different shapes, with zp is ~1.5% higher latency on average.

(Optional) Documentation Update

@czhu-cohere czhu-cohere marked this pull request as draft June 30, 2025 15:57
@czhu-cohere czhu-cohere changed the title Support ZP for Machete [WIP] Support ZP for Machete Jun 30, 2025
Copy link

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project.

💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels.

Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run fastcheck CI which starts running only a small and essential subset of CI tests to quickly catch errors. You can run other CI tests on top of those by going to your fastcheck build on Buildkite UI (linked in the PR checks section) and unblock them. If you do not have permission to unblock, ping simon-mo or khluu to add you in our Buildkite org.

Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging.

To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add ready label to the PR or enable auto-merge.

🚀

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @czhu-cohere, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enables Zero Point support for the Machete kernel within the vLLM frontend, as the Machete kernel already supports it. This change removes the previous restriction that prevented the use of zero points with Machete.

Highlights

  • Machete Kernel: Enabled Zero Point (ZP) support for the Machete kernel in the vLLM frontend.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request enables zero-point quantization for the Machete kernel by removing a feature guard. Ensure adequate test coverage at the MacheteQuantLinear layer level to prevent regressions.

Signed-off-by: czhu-cohere <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: czhu-cohere <[email protected]>
@mergify mergify bot added the performance Performance-related issues label Jun 30, 2025
@czhu-cohere czhu-cohere changed the title [WIP] Support ZP for Machete Enable ZP Support for Machete Jun 30, 2025
Signed-off-by: czhu-cohere <[email protected]>
@czhu-cohere czhu-cohere marked this pull request as ready for review June 30, 2025 17:40
Signed-off-by: czhu-cohere <[email protected]>
@czhu-cohere czhu-cohere requested a review from WoosukKwon as a code owner June 30, 2025 18:38
@robertgshaw2-redhat
Copy link
Collaborator

cc @LucasWilkinson is this okay for machete?

Copy link
Collaborator

@LucasWilkinson LucasWilkinson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense to me! Thanks for the contribution! Happy to see that diff is relatively small 😄. Side-note: I can't access the google doc; id love to see the numbers.

@czhu-cohere
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @mgoin @LucasWilkinson , I uploaded a screenshot for the latency numbers

@LucasWilkinson LucasWilkinson enabled auto-merge (squash) July 1, 2025 02:07
@github-actions github-actions bot added the ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed label Jul 1, 2025
@LucasWilkinson LucasWilkinson merged commit 9909726 into vllm-project:main Jul 1, 2025
88 checks passed
CSWYF3634076 pushed a commit to CSWYF3634076/vllm that referenced this pull request Jul 2, 2025
avigny pushed a commit to avigny/vllm that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2025
jinzhen-lin pushed a commit to jinzhen-lin/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2025
Signed-off-by: czhu-cohere <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jinzhen Lin <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
performance Performance-related issues ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants