-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.2k
[Bugfix] fix quark ptpc #20251
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Bugfix] fix quark ptpc #20251
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Haoyang Li <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Haoyang Li <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @lihaoyang-amd, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request addresses an issue in the Quark quantization implementation, specifically in the QuarkW8A8Fp8
scheme. It ensures that the quantization parameters are correctly initialized and that the appropriate quantization scheme is used during weight processing. Additionally, it handles the case where per-token quantization is needed for dynamic inputs.
Highlights
- Bugfix: Corrects the initialization of
QuarkW8A8Fp8
by passing the weight and input configurations directly, instead of extracting individual parameters. - Quantization Scheme: Ensures the correct quantization scheme (
per_tensor
orper_channel
) is used when processing weights and creating weight scales. - Dynamic Input Handling: Adds logic to handle per-token quantization when the input is dynamic and the input quantization scheme is per-channel.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a bugfix for Quark FP8 quantization, specifically enabling support for dynamic per-token quantization which was previously not handled correctly. The changes are well-structured, refactoring the QuarkW8A8Fp8
scheme to correctly interpret quantization configurations and propagate the necessary flags to the linear operator. The code is clearer and more robust as a result.
👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project. 💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels. Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging. To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add 🚀 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems reasonable, thanks. Is there a test in CI to exercise this code?
@mgoin |
Signed-off-by: Haoyang Li <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Haoyang Li <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Haoyang Li <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Haoyang Li <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: avigny <[email protected]>
This is a fix for importing the quark ptpc quantization format.