Multiple edges between cluster and connected nodes

[gubr123]

As @wimrijnders said:

The cluster edge maintains a direct relation with the one single edge it is replacing. This does not work here because multiple edges need to be replaced with the cluster edge.

Simply, the issue is that when two nodes are connected with more than one edge, the edges remain when clustering, instead of creating a 'cluster edge'.

Here is an example of the issue:

Thats I want it to look - (but I want to leave physics enabled):

If I set the physics to false, so all the edges are lapping and it seems like there is one edge between the cluster and the node.

[wimrijnders]

Discussion moved from #3187. First post edited with more info from said issue.
Here is the demo.

---

Additional from @gubr123 previous discussion:

The problem I'm ecountering with clustering is that the nodes are clustered but the edges aren't. So It causes something like this:

I've seen that disabling physics might help, but I don't want to affect the whole network. Is there any option to replace all the edges in one edge?

[wimrijnders]

Analysis: In the code, there was only one hidden edge assigned per clustered edge. The solution is therefore to allow a clustered edges to replace multiple regular edges.

This does have some consequences, though. Notably, Network.getBaseEdge() is now deficient. I will need to deprecate this and make a new API method (getBaseEdges(), obviously) to replace this. Doable, of course.

Work on this is in progress Done.

[nanialves]

I want to cluster multiple edges but not with clustered node(s). Is there a solution yet?

I asked here if anyone can help. Thanks.