use unerased proxies for associated consts and statics #1793
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
tjhance
force-pushed
the
more-consts-by-proxy
branch
from
338f7c6 to
cdc08da
Compare
Chris-Hawblitzel
approved these changes
Jul 7, 2025
tjhance
force-pushed
the
more-consts-by-proxy
branch
from
cdc08da to
e923c8e
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#1563 introduced this idea of splitting
constitems andconst fnitems in two. This implements the same thing for:constImplItems andconst fnImplItemsstaticitemsThis is needed for #1792