enhancement(aws_cloudwatch_logs sink): add json/emf support
#12866
Conversation
|
|
✅ Deploy Preview for vector-project canceled.
|
github-actions
bot
added
the
domain: sinks
hencrice
force-pushed
the
emf
branch
5 times, most recently
from
97e1638 to
19fc5cb
Compare
hencrice
changed the title
json/emf support
Made it possible to pass in arbitrary request headers such that we can set the "json/emf" header when the logs uploaded by this sink are actually in the Amazon CloudWatch EMF format: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonCloudWatch/latest/monitoring/CloudWatch_Embedded_Metric_Format_Specification.html#CloudWatch_Embedded_Metric_Format_Specification_structure Closes vectordotdev#12760
jszwedko
changed the title
json/emf supportjson/emf support
Signed-off-by: Jesse Szwedko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Szwedko <[email protected]>
github-actions
bot
added
the
domain: external docs
Signed-off-by: Jesse Szwedko <[email protected]>
| .tower | ||
| .unwrap_with(&TowerRequestConfig::default()); | ||
| let client = self.create_client(cx.proxy()).await?; | ||
| let smithy_client = self.create_smithy_client(cx.proxy()).await?; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It would be nice if the 2 smithy_clients being made here could be shared, but I'm not seeing a reasonable way to do that.
Soak Test ResultsBaseline: 7a6f790 ExplanationA soak test is an integrated performance test for vector in a repeatable rig, with varying configuration for vector. What follows is a statistical summary of a brief vector run for each configuration across SHAs given above. The goal of these tests are to determine, quickly, if vector performance is changed and to what degree by a pull request. Where appropriate units are scaled per-core. The table below, if present, lists those experiments that have experienced a statistically significant change in their throughput performance between baseline and comparision SHAs, with 90.0% confidence OR have been detected as newly erratic. Negative values mean that baseline is faster, positive comparison. Results that do not exhibit more than a ±8.87% change in mean throughput are discarded. An experiment is erratic if its coefficient of variation is greater than 0.3. The abbreviated table will be omitted if no interesting changes are observed. No interesting changes in throughput with confidence ≥ 90.00% and absolute Δ mean >= ±8.87%: Fine details of change detection per experiment.
|
Soak Test ResultsBaseline: 7a6f790 ExplanationA soak test is an integrated performance test for vector in a repeatable rig, with varying configuration for vector. What follows is a statistical summary of a brief vector run for each configuration across SHAs given above. The goal of these tests are to determine, quickly, if vector performance is changed and to what degree by a pull request. Where appropriate units are scaled per-core. The table below, if present, lists those experiments that have experienced a statistically significant change in their throughput performance between baseline and comparision SHAs, with 90.0% confidence OR have been detected as newly erratic. Negative values mean that baseline is faster, positive comparison. Results that do not exhibit more than a ±8.87% change in mean throughput are discarded. An experiment is erratic if its coefficient of variation is greater than 0.3. The abbreviated table will be omitted if no interesting changes are observed. No interesting changes in throughput with confidence ≥ 90.00% and absolute Δ mean >= ±8.87%: Fine details of change detection per experiment.
|
Soak Test ResultsBaseline: 7a6f790 ExplanationA soak test is an integrated performance test for vector in a repeatable rig, with varying configuration for vector. What follows is a statistical summary of a brief vector run for each configuration across SHAs given above. The goal of these tests are to determine, quickly, if vector performance is changed and to what degree by a pull request. Where appropriate units are scaled per-core. The table below, if present, lists those experiments that have experienced a statistically significant change in their throughput performance between baseline and comparision SHAs, with 90.0% confidence OR have been detected as newly erratic. Negative values mean that baseline is faster, positive comparison. Results that do not exhibit more than a ±8.87% change in mean throughput are discarded. An experiment is erratic if its coefficient of variation is greater than 0.3. The abbreviated table will be omitted if no interesting changes are observed. No interesting changes in throughput with confidence ≥ 90.00% and absolute Δ mean >= ±8.87%: Fine details of change detection per experiment.
|
Soak Test ResultsBaseline: f825421 ExplanationA soak test is an integrated performance test for vector in a repeatable rig, with varying configuration for vector. What follows is a statistical summary of a brief vector run for each configuration across SHAs given above. The goal of these tests are to determine, quickly, if vector performance is changed and to what degree by a pull request. Where appropriate units are scaled per-core. The table below, if present, lists those experiments that have experienced a statistically significant change in their throughput performance between baseline and comparision SHAs, with 90.0% confidence OR have been detected as newly erratic. Negative values mean that baseline is faster, positive comparison. Results that do not exhibit more than a ±8.87% change in mean throughput are discarded. An experiment is erratic if its coefficient of variation is greater than 0.3. The abbreviated table will be omitted if no interesting changes are observed. No interesting changes in throughput with confidence ≥ 90.00% and absolute Δ mean >= ±8.87%: Fine details of change detection per experiment.
|
|
Looks good, thanks @hencrice ! Once this is merged, it will be in the following nightly release of Vector. It will also be included in the next minor release (0.23) which is currently scheduled for July 5th. |
Soak Test ResultsBaseline: 13ecdbd ExplanationA soak test is an integrated performance test for vector in a repeatable rig, with varying configuration for vector. What follows is a statistical summary of a brief vector run for each configuration across SHAs given above. The goal of these tests are to determine, quickly, if vector performance is changed and to what degree by a pull request. Where appropriate units are scaled per-core. The table below, if present, lists those experiments that have experienced a statistically significant change in their throughput performance between baseline and comparision SHAs, with 90.0% confidence OR have been detected as newly erratic. Negative values mean that baseline is faster, positive comparison. Results that do not exhibit more than a ±8.87% change in mean throughput are discarded. An experiment is erratic if its coefficient of variation is greater than 0.3. The abbreviated table will be omitted if no interesting changes are observed. No interesting changes in throughput with confidence ≥ 90.00% and absolute Δ mean >= ±8.87%: Fine details of change detection per experiment.
|
4 participants
Made it possible to pass in arbitrary request headers such that we can
set the "json/emf" header when the logs uploaded by this sink are
actually in the Amazon CloudWatch EMF format: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonCloudWatch/latest/monitoring/CloudWatch_Embedded_Metric_Format_Specification.html#CloudWatch_Embedded_Metric_Format_Specification_structure
Closes #12760