-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
Added configuration option UseStrictDomainMatching, which allows control over whether content is routed without a matching domain #19815
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
AndyButland
wants to merge
2
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
v16/feature/strict-domain-matching
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+207
−13
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
153 changes: 153 additions & 0 deletions
153
tests/Umbraco.Tests.UnitTests/Umbraco.Core/Routing/ContentFinderByUrlNewTests.cs
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@ | ||
using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions; | ||
using Microsoft.Extensions.Options; | ||
using Moq; | ||
using NUnit.Framework; | ||
using Umbraco.Cms.Core.Configuration.Models; | ||
using Umbraco.Cms.Core.Models.PublishedContent; | ||
using Umbraco.Cms.Core.PublishedCache; | ||
using Umbraco.Cms.Core.Routing; | ||
using Umbraco.Cms.Core.Services; | ||
using Umbraco.Cms.Core.Web; | ||
|
||
namespace Umbraco.Cms.Tests.UnitTests.Umbraco.Core.Routing; | ||
|
||
[TestFixture] | ||
public class ContentFinderByUrlNewTests | ||
{ | ||
private const int DomainContentId = 1233; | ||
private const int ContentId = 1234; | ||
private static readonly Guid _contentKey = Guid.NewGuid(); | ||
private const string ContentPath = "/test-page"; | ||
private const string DomainHost = "example.com"; | ||
|
||
[TestCase(ContentPath, true)] | ||
[TestCase("/missing-page", false)] | ||
public async Task Can_Find_Invariant_Content(string path, bool expectSuccess) | ||
{ | ||
var mockContent = CreateMockPublishedContent(); | ||
|
||
var mockUmbracoContextAccessor = CreateMockUmbracoContextAccessor(); | ||
|
||
var mockDocumentUrlService = CreateMockDocumentUrlService(); | ||
|
||
var mockPublishedContentCache = CreateMockPublishedContentCache(mockContent); | ||
|
||
var sut = CreateContentFinder(mockUmbracoContextAccessor, mockDocumentUrlService, mockPublishedContentCache); | ||
|
||
var publishedRequestBuilder = CreatePublishedRequestBuilder(path); | ||
|
||
var result = await sut.TryFindContent(publishedRequestBuilder); | ||
|
||
Assert.AreEqual(expectSuccess, result); | ||
if (expectSuccess) | ||
{ | ||
Assert.IsNotNull(publishedRequestBuilder.PublishedContent); | ||
} | ||
else | ||
{ | ||
Assert.IsNull(publishedRequestBuilder.PublishedContent); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
[TestCase(ContentPath, true, false, true)] | ||
[TestCase("/missing-page", true, false, false)] | ||
[TestCase(ContentPath, true, true, true)] | ||
[TestCase(ContentPath, false, true, false)] | ||
public async Task Can_Find_Invariant_Content_With_Domain(string path, bool setDomain, bool useStrictDomainMatching, bool expectSuccess) | ||
{ | ||
var mockContent = CreateMockPublishedContent(); | ||
|
||
var mockUmbracoContextAccessor = CreateMockUmbracoContextAccessor(); | ||
|
||
var mockDocumentUrlService = CreateMockDocumentUrlService(); | ||
|
||
var mockPublishedContentCache = CreateMockPublishedContentCache(mockContent); | ||
|
||
var sut = CreateContentFinder( | ||
mockUmbracoContextAccessor, | ||
mockDocumentUrlService, | ||
mockPublishedContentCache, | ||
new WebRoutingSettings | ||
{ | ||
UseStrictDomainMatching = useStrictDomainMatching | ||
}); | ||
|
||
var publishedRequestBuilder = CreatePublishedRequestBuilder(path, withDomain: setDomain); | ||
|
||
var result = await sut.TryFindContent(publishedRequestBuilder); | ||
|
||
Assert.AreEqual(expectSuccess, result); | ||
if (expectSuccess) | ||
{ | ||
Assert.IsNotNull(publishedRequestBuilder.PublishedContent); | ||
} | ||
else | ||
{ | ||
Assert.IsNull(publishedRequestBuilder.PublishedContent); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
private static Mock<IPublishedContent> CreateMockPublishedContent() | ||
{ | ||
var mockContent = new Mock<IPublishedContent>(); | ||
mockContent | ||
.SetupGet(x => x.Id) | ||
.Returns(ContentId); | ||
mockContent | ||
.SetupGet(x => x.ContentType.ItemType) | ||
.Returns(PublishedItemType.Content); | ||
return mockContent; | ||
} | ||
|
||
private static Mock<IUmbracoContextAccessor> CreateMockUmbracoContextAccessor() | ||
{ | ||
var mockUmbracoContext = new Mock<IUmbracoContext>(); | ||
var mockUmbracoContextAccessor = new Mock<IUmbracoContextAccessor>(); | ||
var umbracoContext = mockUmbracoContext.Object; | ||
mockUmbracoContextAccessor | ||
.Setup(x => x.TryGetUmbracoContext(out umbracoContext)) | ||
.Returns(true); | ||
return mockUmbracoContextAccessor; | ||
} | ||
|
||
private static Mock<IDocumentUrlService> CreateMockDocumentUrlService() | ||
{ | ||
var mockDocumentUrlService = new Mock<IDocumentUrlService>(); | ||
mockDocumentUrlService | ||
.Setup(x => x.GetDocumentKeyByRoute(It.Is<string>(y => y == ContentPath), It.IsAny<string?>(), It.IsAny<int?>(), It.IsAny<bool>())) | ||
.Returns(_contentKey); | ||
return mockDocumentUrlService; | ||
} | ||
|
||
private static Mock<IPublishedContentCache> CreateMockPublishedContentCache(Mock<IPublishedContent> mockContent) | ||
{ | ||
var mockPublishedContentCache = new Mock<IPublishedContentCache>(); | ||
mockPublishedContentCache | ||
.Setup(x => x.GetById(It.IsAny<bool>(), It.Is<Guid>(y => y == _contentKey))) | ||
.Returns(mockContent.Object); | ||
return mockPublishedContentCache; | ||
} | ||
|
||
private static ContentFinderByUrlNew CreateContentFinder( | ||
Mock<IUmbracoContextAccessor> mockUmbracoContextAccessor, | ||
Mock<IDocumentUrlService> mockDocumentUrlService, | ||
Mock<IPublishedContentCache> mockPublishedContentCache, | ||
WebRoutingSettings? webRoutingSettings = null) | ||
=> new( | ||
new NullLogger<ContentFinderByUrlNew>(), | ||
mockUmbracoContextAccessor.Object, | ||
mockDocumentUrlService.Object, | ||
mockPublishedContentCache.Object, | ||
Mock.Of<IOptionsMonitor<WebRoutingSettings>>(x => x.CurrentValue == (webRoutingSettings ?? new WebRoutingSettings()))); | ||
|
||
private static PublishedRequestBuilder CreatePublishedRequestBuilder(string path, bool withDomain = false) | ||
{ | ||
var publishedRequestBuilder = new PublishedRequestBuilder(new Uri($"https://example.com{path}"), Mock.Of<IFileService>()); | ||
if (withDomain) | ||
{ | ||
publishedRequestBuilder.SetDomain(new DomainAndUri(new Domain(1, $"https://{DomainHost}/", DomainContentId, "en-US", false, 0), new Uri($"https://{DomainHost}{path}"))); | ||
} | ||
|
||
return publishedRequestBuilder; | ||
} | ||
} |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.