Skip to content

Conversation

glenn-jocher
Copy link
Member

@glenn-jocher glenn-jocher commented Aug 20, 2022

Resolves #9041

Signed-off-by: Glenn Jocher [email protected]

🛠️ PR Summary

Made with ❤️ by Ultralytics Actions

🌟 Summary

Enhanced flexibility in validation script with new save_hybrid option.

📊 Key Changes

  • Added support for a new save_hybrid option within the validation (val.py) script.

🎯 Purpose & Impact

  • Purpose: This change allows users to optionally activate a new feature during model validation, which seemed to be tied to saving hybrid results based on the name save_hybrid.
  • Impact: Users can now have more control over how they save their validation results, potentially enabling new workflows or result types. However, without further context, the specific nature of the 'hybrid' results is not clear, but this enhancement is directed towards users requiring this new functionality. ⚙️💾

Signed-off-by: Glenn Jocher <[email protected]>
@glenn-jocher glenn-jocher self-assigned this Aug 20, 2022
Signed-off-by: Glenn Jocher <[email protected]>
@glenn-jocher glenn-jocher merged commit f258cf8 into master Aug 20, 2022
@glenn-jocher glenn-jocher deleted the glenn-jocher-patch-1 branch August 20, 2022 15:17
ctjanuhowski pushed a commit to ctjanuhowski/yolov5 that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2022
* Add `--save-hybrid` mAP warning

Signed-off-by: Glenn Jocher <[email protected]>

* Update val.py

Signed-off-by: Glenn Jocher <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Glenn Jocher <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

different results with --save-hybrid

1 participant