feat: Add config-based ATTACH DATABASE API #328
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Implements config-based ATTACH API with explicit attach()/detach() methods.
This supersedes #327 and implements the config-based approach suggested by maintainers in the previous PR discussion.
Changes
Core API (libsql-core)
AttachConfiginterface withaliasandpathfieldsattach?: AttachConfig[]option increateClient()config for static attachmentsclient.attach(alias, path)andclient.detach(alias)methods for dynamic attachmentsImplementation (Sqlite3Client)
transaction()andreconnect()file:///path?mode=roURIsRemote Clients (HTTP/WebSocket)
ATTACH_NOT_SUPPORTEDerrorTests
Design Principles
Zero overhead: No SQL parsing or regex matching. Users explicitly control when and what to attach.
Persistence: Attachments survive transaction() (which nulls the connection) and reconnect() by re-applying from stored config.
Unified storage: Single internal array stores both config and explicit attachments, ensuring consistent behavior.
Addresses feedback from #327
Example Usage
Static attachments:
Dynamic attachments:
Closes #327