Comply with DITA - Mng content - role abstract #4403
Closed
+217
−0
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
Needs tech review
Lennonka
removed
Needs tech review
| [id="Configuring_Custom_Alternate_Content_Sources_{context}"] | ||
| = Configuring custom alternate content sources | ||
|
|
||
| [role="_abstract"] |
| [id="Configuring_RHUI_Alternate_Content_Sources_{context}"] | ||
| = Configuring RHUI alternate content sources | ||
|
|
||
| [role="_abstract"] |
| [id="Configuring_Simplified_Alternate_Content_Sources_{context}"] | ||
| = Configuring simplified alternate content sources | ||
|
|
||
| [role="_abstract"] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Lacks an abstract.
How about
You can configure simplified alternate content sources (ACS) to download packages on {SmartProxyServers} from the upstream source.
Metadata will always come from your {ProjectServer}.
| [role="_abstract"] | ||
| Use the following procedure to create an activation key that you can use to subscribe your hosts to content managed by {Project}. | ||
|
|
||
| . In the {ProjectWebUI}, navigate to *Content* > *Lifecycle* > *Activation Keys*. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| . In the {ProjectWebUI}, navigate to *Content* > *Lifecycle* > *Activation Keys*. | |
| .Procedure | |
| . In the {ProjectWebUI}, navigate to *Content* > *Lifecycle* > *Activation Keys*. |
out of scope but I couldn't help myself.
| [id="Importing_Syncable_Exports_{context}"] | ||
| = Importing syncable exports | ||
|
|
||
| [role="_abstract"] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This module lacks an abstract.
| [role="_abstract"] | ||
| You can remove all content view environments from an activation key by doing either of the following: | ||
|
|
||
| .CLI procedure |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| .CLI procedure | |
| .Procedure |
Could also be out of scope. Your call.
|
@maximiliankolb I truly appreciate the effort, but this PR is in draft for a reason and as such not ready for review. |
|
I think it will be better if I go chapter by chapter. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes are you introducing?
Adding
[role="_abstract"]to modules in the Managing content guideWhy are you introducing these changes? (Explanation, links to references, issues, etc.)
DITA compliance
Anything else to add? (Considerations, potential downsides, alternative solutions you have explored, etc.)
Contributor checklists
Please cherry-pick my commits into: