Skip to content

Conversation

jeverling
Copy link
Contributor

Hi all, based on issue #2566 and PR #2565 by @KenyaDonDraper, this PR adds this functionality plus a setting that enables this check (defaulting to false). This way, this functionality can be added without possibly affecting existing workflows.
I also added documentation and tests.

@jeverling jeverling requested review from dlstadther and a team as code owners May 30, 2022 11:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant