Skip to content

Conversation

@saurabharch
Copy link
Owner

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the yarn dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • scripts/bench/package.json
  • scripts/bench/yarn.lock

Note for zero-installs users

If you are using the Yarn feature zero-installs that was introduced in Yarn V2, note that this PR does not update the .yarn/cache/ directory meaning this code cannot be pulled and immediately developed on as one would expect for a zero-install project - you will need to run yarn to update the contents of the ./yarn/cache directory.
If you are not using zero-install you can ignore this as your flow should likely be unchanged.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
medium severity Symlink Attack
SNYK-JS-TMP-11501554
  733  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

…ulnerabilities

The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-TMP-11501554
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @saurabharch, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request performs a critical security upgrade of the "lighthouse" dependency within the "scripts/bench" module. The primary goal is to mitigate a known "Symlink Attack" vulnerability by updating "lighthouse" to a much newer major version. This change is confined to the dependency management files, ensuring the "scripts/bench" environment benefits from the latest security patches and improvements.

Highlights

  • Dependency Upgrade: The "lighthouse" dependency in the "scripts/bench" module has been upgraded from version 3.2.1 to 7.4.0.
  • Security Fix: This upgrade specifically addresses a medium-severity "Symlink Attack" vulnerability (SNYK-JS-TMP-11501554) found in the previous version of "lighthouse".
  • Dependency Manifest Updates: The update involved changes to both "package.json" and "yarn.lock" within the "scripts/bench" directory, reflecting the significant version jump and its impact on transitive dependencies.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request upgrades the lighthouse dependency from version 3.2.1 to 7.4.0 to address a security vulnerability. This is a major version bump that introduces breaking changes. My review focuses on the potential impact of these changes. I've identified a critical issue where the benchmark script will fail due to an API change in lighthouse. The script needs to be updated to work with the new version.

"http-server": "^0.10.0",
"http2": "^3.3.6",
"lighthouse": "^3.2.1",
"lighthouse": "^7.4.0",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

Upgrading lighthouse from v3 to v7 is a major version change that will break the benchmark script at scripts/bench/benchmark.js.

The Lighthouse function is called with an output option as a string: output: 'json'. In Lighthouse v7, this option must be an array of strings, for example ['json']. This will cause an error when running the benchmarks.

Please update the benchmark script to align with the new lighthouse API to ensure it remains functional after this upgrade.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants