Skip to content

fix for compiling and packaging for fedora42 #212

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 30, 2025

Conversation

AnthonyLloydDotNet
Copy link
Contributor

@AnthonyLloydDotNet AnthonyLloydDotNet commented Apr 30, 2025

rm -rf build
mkdir build && cd build
cmake .. -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr -DGPGFRONTEND_GENERATE_LINUX_INSTALL_SOFTWARE=ON
make -j$nproc
cpack -G RPM
sudo dnf install ./GpgFrontend-2.1.8-Linux.rpm

~ » which GpgFrontend 1 ↵ anthony@workstation
/usr/bin/GpgFrontend

~ »

~ » gtk-launch GpgFrontend anthony@workstation

gtk-launch: no such application GpgFrontend

~ » gtk-launch com.bktus.gpgfrontend.desktop 2 ↵ anthony@workstation

~ » [20250430 15:22:33.525] [core] [W] [187501] - integrated modules at path: "/usr/bin/modules" not found, abort...ny@workstation
[20250430 15:22:33.626] [core] [C] [187502] - gpgconf kill args: QList("--homedir", "/home/anthony/.gnupg", "--kill", "gpg-agent") channel: 0
[20250430 15:22:33.629] [core] [C] [187502] - gpg-agent start args: QList("--homedir", "/home/anthony/.gnupg", "--daemon", "--enable-ssh-support", "--pinentry-program", "/usr/bin/pinentry-gnome3") channel: 0


~ »

got it to install to fedora and show in the start menu
image
image
I haven't got the taskbar icon to work yet

@saturneric
Copy link
Owner

Good, and I'm going to merge it. If you have any further progress, feel free to continue.

@saturneric saturneric merged commit b927f57 into saturneric:main Apr 30, 2025
8 of 11 checks passed
@AnthonyLloydDotNet
Copy link
Contributor Author

Good, and I'm going to merge it. If you have any further progress, feel free to continue.

if rpm builds are out of scope for the repo let me know, the implementation i put in is a bit hacky and doesnt include the proper conventions

@saturneric
Copy link
Owner

if rpm builds are out of scope for the repo let me know, the implementation i put in is a bit hacky and doesnt include the proper conventions

I've refactored the entire cmake configuration and merged your work into it. You can check out the latest commit of main.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants