-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.2k
yet another improvment to rustdoc js typechecking #149327
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Some changes occurred in HTML/CSS/JS. |
|
r? @notriddle rustbot has assigned @notriddle. Use |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
| console.log(filterCrates); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| console.log(filterCrates); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
whoops!
yea this was from testing to figure out which type signature was correct.
| if (active) { | ||
| const next = active.nextElementSibling; | ||
| if (next) { | ||
| // @ts-expect-error |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please leave a comment explaining why this is okay?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
SvgElement, MathMLElement, and HTMLElement all define .focus()
honestly i'm not even sure what hypothetical element would not have the ability to be focused.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If the element has tabindex="-1". Although I think the focus method remains available.
|
@bors r+ |
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
What is this?This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.Comparing 3ff30e7 (parent) -> 91ab308 (this PR) Test differencesShow 3 test diffs3 doctest diffs were found. These are ignored, as they are noisy. Test dashboardRun cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
test-dashboard 91ab3083bb2d163dfa408033ac01c73970630cf9 --output-dir test-dashboardAnd then open Job duration changes
How to interpret the job duration changes?Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (91ab308): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)Results (secondary 3.4%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
CyclesResults (primary 2.9%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 470.301s -> 471.398s (0.23%) |
…notriddle yet another improvment to rustdoc js typechecking biggest improvment is the docs for `FunctionType` and the signatures for functions that accept names of crates were both slightly wrong, this has now been fixed.
biggest improvment is the docs for
FunctionTypeand the signatures for functions that accept names of crates were both slightly wrong, this has now been fixed.