Skip to content

Conversation

@lolbinarycat
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc-frontend Relevant to the rustdoc-frontend team, which will review and decide on the web UI/UX output. labels Nov 12, 2025
@lolbinarycat
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors2 try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2025
rustdoc: microoptimize render_item, move stuff out of common path
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Nov 12, 2025
@rust-bors
Copy link

rust-bors bot commented Nov 13, 2025

💥 Test timed out after 21600s

@lolbinarycat
Copy link
Contributor Author

Well that's weird.

@bors try

rust-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2025
rustdoc: microoptimize render_item, move stuff out of common path
@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-bors
Copy link

rust-bors bot commented Nov 13, 2025

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 6b58920 (6b589205722c3dd266a9917cb1ea3210eda969db, parent: af5c5b74c8f2c0b1dfd9a201453bf2df538e93e0)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (6b58920): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.7% [-3.1%, -0.4%] 2
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-1.5% [-3.0%, -1.2%] 7
All ❌✅ (primary) -1.7% [-3.1%, -0.4%] 2

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -2.3%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-2.3% [-2.3%, -2.3%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -2.3% [-2.3%, -2.3%] 1

Cycles

Results (primary 2.4%, secondary 2.0%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.4% [2.4%, 2.4%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.0% [1.7%, 2.4%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 2.4% [2.4%, 2.4%] 1

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 475.694s -> 475.403s (-0.06%)
Artifact size: 388.39 MiB -> 388.40 MiB (0.00%)

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Nov 13, 2025
@lolbinarycat
Copy link
Contributor Author

lolbinarycat commented Nov 14, 2025

Finally managed to find a simple optimization that actually leads to statistically significant improvements!

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. label Nov 14, 2025
@lolbinarycat lolbinarycat reopened this Nov 14, 2025
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. label Nov 14, 2025
@lolbinarycat lolbinarycat marked this pull request as ready for review November 14, 2025 16:40
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 14, 2025
@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. label Nov 14, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 14, 2025

r? @GuillaumeGomez

rustbot has assigned @GuillaumeGomez.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Nicely done, thanks!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 15, 2025

📌 Commit 3008626 has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 15, 2025
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 15, 2025

⌛ Testing commit 3008626 with merge e65b983...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2025
…aumeGomez

rustdoc: microoptimize render_item, move stuff out of common path
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc-frontend Relevant to the rustdoc-frontend team, which will review and decide on the web UI/UX output.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants