Skip to content

Conversation

ppedrot
Copy link
Member

@ppedrot ppedrot commented Oct 11, 2025

The previous code was probably buggy, because the corresponding inductive table uses user names, so there might have been a desynchronization. That said, it is not even clear because the data is the same for aliased inductive types, and was not even accessed by the code. So this change should be a no-op. To make this clearer, we seize the opportunity to replace maps with sets.

The previous code was probably buggy, because the corresponding
inductive table uses user names, so there might have been a
desynchronization. That said, it is not even clear because the data
is the same for aliased inductive types, and was not even accessed
by the code. So this change should be a no-op. To make this clearer,
we seize the opportunity to replace maps with sets.
@ppedrot ppedrot added this to the 9.2+rc1 milestone Oct 11, 2025
@ppedrot ppedrot requested a review from a team as a code owner October 11, 2025 12:09
@ppedrot ppedrot added kind: cleanup Code removal, deprecation, refactorings, etc. request: full CI Use this label when you want your next push to trigger a full CI. labels Oct 11, 2025
@coqbot-app coqbot-app bot removed the request: full CI Use this label when you want your next push to trigger a full CI. label Oct 11, 2025
@SkySkimmer SkySkimmer self-assigned this Oct 13, 2025
@SkySkimmer
Copy link
Contributor

@coqbot merge now

@coqbot-app coqbot-app bot merged commit ec7b53f into rocq-prover:master Oct 13, 2025
7 checks passed
@ppedrot ppedrot deleted the rm-canord-extraction-table branch October 13, 2025 09:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

kind: cleanup Code removal, deprecation, refactorings, etc.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants