Skip to content

Conversation

Villetaneuse
Copy link
Contributor

@Villetaneuse Villetaneuse commented May 26, 2025

I don't think the average user cares about other tactics languages when browsing this part of the tutorial.
Other tactics languages are already mentioned in the "Creating new tactics" part of the refman.

Add a reference to the Ltac2 part of the Rocq website.

Prerequisite: #20680

Fixes / closes: #20450

Rendered: https://coq.gitlabpages.inria.fr/-/coq/-/jobs/5805727/artifacts/_build/default/doc/refman-html/proof-engine/ltac2.html?highlight=ltac2

I don't think the average user cares about other tactics languages when
browsing this part of the tutorial.
Other tactics languages are already mentioned in the "Creating new
tactics" part of the refman.

Add a reference to the Ltac2 part of the Rocq website.

Prerequisite: rocq-prover#20680

Fixes/closes: rocq-prover#20450
@Villetaneuse Villetaneuse requested a review from a team as a code owner May 26, 2025 08:00
@coqbot-app coqbot-app bot added the needs: full CI The latest GitLab pipeline that ran was a light CI. Say "@coqbot run full ci" to get a full CI. label May 26, 2025
@Villetaneuse Villetaneuse added the kind: documentation Additions or improvement to documentation. label May 26, 2025
@Villetaneuse Villetaneuse added this to the 9.0.1 milestone May 26, 2025
instead of hard coding it
@Villetaneuse Villetaneuse removed the needs: full CI The latest GitLab pipeline that ran was a light CI. Say "@coqbot run full ci" to get a full CI. label May 30, 2025
@SkySkimmer SkySkimmer requested a review from ppedrot June 2, 2025 10:37
Copy link
Member

@Zimmi48 Zimmi48 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This introduction looks good to me.

@coqbot-app coqbot-app bot added the needs: full CI The latest GitLab pipeline that ran was a light CI. Say "@coqbot run full ci" to get a full CI. label Jun 4, 2025
@Villetaneuse
Copy link
Contributor Author

The link is broken.

@proux01 proux01 self-assigned this Jun 6, 2025
@proux01
Copy link
Contributor

proux01 commented Jun 6, 2025

@coqbot merge now

Copy link
Contributor

coqbot-app bot commented Jun 6, 2025

@proux01: You cannot merge this PR because:

  • There is still a needs: full CI label.

@proux01 proux01 removed the needs: full CI The latest GitLab pipeline that ran was a light CI. Say "@coqbot run full ci" to get a full CI. label Jun 6, 2025
@proux01
Copy link
Contributor

proux01 commented Jun 6, 2025

@coqbot merge now

@coqbot-app coqbot-app bot merged commit 77826ee into rocq-prover:master Jun 6, 2025
6 checks passed
@Villetaneuse Villetaneuse deleted the refer_to_Ltac2vfiles branch June 12, 2025 08:35
ppedrot added a commit to ppedrot/coq that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind: documentation Additions or improvement to documentation.
Projects
Status: No status
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Ltac2 page in refman should refer to Corelib
3 participants