Skip to content

Conversation

@MattKotsenas
Copy link
Collaborator

@MattKotsenas MattKotsenas commented Oct 24, 2024

Fixes #238

  • Add a generic section on rule configuration to suppress / upgrade rule severity
  • Add a section on how to suppress the rule to each rule's doc (format the same as the CAXXX rules)
  • Add missing Moq1400 from //docs/README.md
  • Fix table alignment / padding in //docs/rules/*.md

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added a "Configuring rules" section to the README for clearer guidance on enabling and disabling analyzer rules.
    • Introduced a new rule regarding mocking behavior in the rules README.
  • Documentation

    • Enhanced clarity and usability in multiple documentation files related to Moq rules, including guidance on suppressing warnings and improved table formatting.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved readability and structure across various rule documents to aid developers in understanding and implementing the Moq library effectively.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 24, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces significant updates to the documentation for the Moq.Analyzers project, specifically enhancing clarity on suppressing warnings related to various analyzer rules. A new section titled "Configuring rules" has been added to the README.md, along with detailed instructions in multiple rule documentation files (Moq1000.md, Moq1001.md, etc.) on how to suppress specific warnings using preprocessor directives. Formatting improvements have been made throughout to enhance readability and usability.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md Added a new section "Configuring rules" for enabling/disabling analyzer rules.
docs/rules/Moq1000.md Updated for clarity; added guidance on suppressing Moq1000 warnings with code examples.
docs/rules/Moq1001.md Enhanced clarity; added a section on suppressing Moq1001 warnings with code snippets.
docs/rules/Moq1002.md Improved clarity; included guidance on suppressing Moq1002 warnings with examples.
docs/rules/Moq1100.md Clarified callback signature requirements; added suppression guidance for Moq1100 warnings.
docs/rules/Moq1101.md Clarified usage of .SetupGet() and .SetupSet(); added section on suppressing Moq1101 warnings.
docs/rules/Moq1200.md Enhanced clarity; added guidance on suppressing Moq1200 warnings with examples.
docs/rules/Moq1201.md Updated guidance on mocking async methods; added suppression instructions for Moq1201 warnings.
docs/rules/Moq1300.md Clarified usage of Mock.As(); added suppression guidance for Moq1300 warnings.
docs/rules/Moq1400.md Enhanced clarity on mocking behavior; added suppression instructions for Moq1400 warnings.
docs/rules/README.md Improved table formatting; added new rule entry for Moq1400 regarding mocking behavior.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Explain how to suppress a rule (238)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

documentation, releasable, housekeeping

Suggested reviewers

  • rjmurillo

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@qlty-cloud-legacy
Copy link

Code Climate has analyzed commit f91f04c and detected 7 issues on this pull request.

Here's the issue category breakdown:

Category Count
Style 7

View more on Code Climate.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 12

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f2f9790 and f91f04c.

📒 Files selected for processing (11)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/rules/Moq1000.md (2 hunks)
  • docs/rules/Moq1001.md (2 hunks)
  • docs/rules/Moq1002.md (2 hunks)
  • docs/rules/Moq1100.md (2 hunks)
  • docs/rules/Moq1101.md (2 hunks)
  • docs/rules/Moq1200.md (2 hunks)
  • docs/rules/Moq1201.md (2 hunks)
  • docs/rules/Moq1300.md (2 hunks)
  • docs/rules/Moq1400.md (2 hunks)
  • docs/rules/README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (10)
docs/rules/Moq1000.md (1)

Pattern docs/rules/**/*.md: Evaluate the markdown files against the standards for Roslyn Code Analysis rules

docs/rules/Moq1001.md (1)

Pattern docs/rules/**/*.md: Evaluate the markdown files against the standards for Roslyn Code Analysis rules

docs/rules/Moq1002.md (1)

Pattern docs/rules/**/*.md: Evaluate the markdown files against the standards for Roslyn Code Analysis rules

docs/rules/Moq1100.md (1)

Pattern docs/rules/**/*.md: Evaluate the markdown files against the standards for Roslyn Code Analysis rules

docs/rules/Moq1101.md (1)

Pattern docs/rules/**/*.md: Evaluate the markdown files against the standards for Roslyn Code Analysis rules

docs/rules/Moq1200.md (1)

Pattern docs/rules/**/*.md: Evaluate the markdown files against the standards for Roslyn Code Analysis rules

docs/rules/Moq1201.md (1)

Pattern docs/rules/**/*.md: Evaluate the markdown files against the standards for Roslyn Code Analysis rules

docs/rules/Moq1300.md (1)

Pattern docs/rules/**/*.md: Evaluate the markdown files against the standards for Roslyn Code Analysis rules

docs/rules/Moq1400.md (1)

Pattern docs/rules/**/*.md: Evaluate the markdown files against the standards for Roslyn Code Analysis rules

docs/rules/README.md (1)

Pattern docs/rules/**/*.md: Evaluate the markdown files against the standards for Roslyn Code Analysis rules

🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[uncategorized] ~39-~39: This verb does not appear to agree with the subject. Consider using a different form.
Context: .... ### Configuring rules Moq.Analyzers follows existing conventions for enabling, disa...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_AGREEMENT)

🪛 Markdownlint
docs/rules/Moq1000.md

7-7: null
Tables should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD058, blanks-around-tables)

docs/rules/Moq1001.md

7-7: null
Tables should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD058, blanks-around-tables)

docs/rules/Moq1002.md

7-7: null
Tables should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD058, blanks-around-tables)

docs/rules/Moq1100.md

7-7: null
Tables should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD058, blanks-around-tables)

docs/rules/Moq1101.md

7-7: null
Tables should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD058, blanks-around-tables)

docs/rules/Moq1200.md

7-7: null
Tables should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD058, blanks-around-tables)

docs/rules/Moq1201.md

7-7: null
Tables should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD058, blanks-around-tables)

docs/rules/Moq1300.md

7-7: null
Tables should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD058, blanks-around-tables)

docs/rules/Moq1400.md

7-7: null
Tables should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD058, blanks-around-tables)

🔇 Additional comments (11)
docs/rules/README.md (2)

3-4: LGTM! Table formatting is clean and consistent.

The table structure follows markdown best practices with proper alignment and spacing.


13-13: LGTM! New rule documentation is well-structured.

The Moq1400 rule entry follows the established pattern and provides clear guidance about explicit mocking behavior configuration.

docs/rules/Moq1000.md (1)

31-53: LGTM! Well-structured suppression documentation.

The new section excellently addresses issue #238 by:

  • Providing clear instructions for both inline and configuration-based suppression
  • Including practical code examples
  • Linking to official documentation for further reading
docs/rules/Moq1001.md (1)

36-58: LGTM! Well-structured documentation on rule suppression.

The new section effectively addresses the original issue by providing:

  • Clear instructions for both inline and configuration-based suppression
  • Accurate code examples
  • Helpful references to official documentation
docs/rules/Moq1200.md (1)

37-60: LGTM! Well-structured suppression documentation.

The new section effectively addresses the PR objectives by:

  • Providing clear instructions for both inline and configuration-based suppression
  • Including practical code examples with proper syntax highlighting
  • Linking to official Microsoft documentation for further reading
docs/rules/Moq1101.md (1)

34-55: LGTM! Well-documented rule suppression instructions.

The new section excellently fulfills the PR objectives by:

  • Providing clear instructions for both inline and configuration-based suppression
  • Including practical code examples
  • Linking to official documentation for further reading
docs/rules/Moq1300.md (1)

49-71: LGTM! Well-documented rule suppression guidance.

The new section excellently addresses the documentation gap identified in issue #238. It provides:

  • Clear instructions for both inline and configuration-based suppression
  • Practical code examples
  • Helpful links to official documentation
docs/rules/Moq1201.md (1)

37-59: Well-structured and comprehensive rule suppression documentation!

The new section effectively addresses the PR objectives by:

  • Providing clear instructions for both inline and configuration-based suppression
  • Including practical code examples
  • Linking to official documentation for further reading
docs/rules/Moq1100.md (1)

41-64: Well-structured and comprehensive rule suppression documentation!

The new section effectively addresses the documentation gap identified in issue #238 by:

  • Providing clear examples for both inline suppression and configuration-based approaches
  • Including proper references to Microsoft's official documentation
  • Following a consistent format with other rule documentation
docs/rules/Moq1400.md (1)

49-71: LGTM! Well-structured rule suppression documentation.

The new section on rule suppression is comprehensive and follows best practices:

  • Clear examples of both inline suppression using preprocessor directives
  • Configuration-based suppression instructions
  • Proper references to official documentation
  • Consistent formatting with other rule documentation
README.md (1)

37-41: LGTM! The new section addresses the documentation gap.

The addition of the "Configuring rules" section with a reference to official Microsoft documentation fulfills the primary objective of documenting rule suppression capabilities.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~39-~39: This verb does not appear to agree with the subject. Consider using a different form.
Context: .... ### Configuring rules Moq.Analyzers follows existing conventions for enabling, disa...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_AGREEMENT)

@abatishchev
Copy link

Thank you!

Copy link
Owner

@rjmurillo rjmurillo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this!

@MattKotsenas MattKotsenas merged commit 1fa583b into rjmurillo:main Oct 25, 2024
9 checks passed
@rjmurillo rjmurillo added this to the vNext milestone Oct 25, 2024
@MattKotsenas MattKotsenas deleted the bugfix/suppression-docs branch October 25, 2024 04:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

How to suppress? Doc doesn't say

3 participants