Skip to content

Cache Rizin build directory in GitHub Actions workflow #67

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

VaiTon
Copy link
Contributor

@VaiTon VaiTon commented Jun 24, 2025

No description provided.

@VaiTon VaiTon force-pushed the cache-rizin branch 4 times, most recently from 01428a6 to 7edf257 Compare June 24, 2025 23:32
@VaiTon VaiTon marked this pull request as draft June 24, 2025 23:32
@VaiTon VaiTon marked this pull request as ready for review June 25, 2025 00:07
Copy link
Member

@wargio wargio left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i don't think this is a good idea to cache the rizin dir.

@VaiTon
Copy link
Contributor Author

VaiTon commented Jun 26, 2025

Why? Each time we rebuild the exact same thing. We're targeting a released version, not dev branch commits

@wargio
Copy link
Member

wargio commented Jun 26, 2025

I know but I prefer to build each time. @ret2libc @notxvilka @Rot127 what do you guys think?

@Rot127
Copy link
Member

Rot127 commented Jun 26, 2025

Idk. Caching is nice. But I don't think we run this workflow often enough to justify the additional dependency. Or is this wrong? Just have seen I don't watch this repo.

@VaiTon
Copy link
Contributor Author

VaiTon commented Jun 26, 2025

But I don't think we run this workflow often enough to justify the additional dependency.

We run this workflow on each commit and in each PR, and the only dependency introduced is on actions/cache@v4

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants