feat: add more semantic structure #1168
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
💡 Enable Vercel Agent with $100 free credit for automated AI reviews |
Summary of ChangesHello @zombieJ, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly enhances the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. Walkthrough该 PR 扩展了 BaseSelect 的语义名称集合，并在 SingleContent、MultipleContent、Placeholder 中通过 useBaseProps 接入并应用 classNames/styles，同时新增语义化样式相关的单元测试，Placeholder 增加了基于 displayValues 的早退逻辑。 Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant BaseSelect
participant useBaseProps
participant SingleContent
participant MultipleContent
participant Placeholder
BaseSelect->>useBaseProps: 读取/传递 classNames & styles
useBaseProps-->>BaseSelect: 返回 { classNames, styles, ... }
BaseSelect->>SingleContent: render(props, classNames/styles)
SingleContent->>SingleContent: 应用 classNames.content / styles.content
BaseSelect->>MultipleContent: render(props, classNames/styles)
MultipleContent->>MultipleContent: 应用 classNames.item/itemContent/itemRemove/content 与 styles
BaseSelect->>Placeholder: render(displayValues, classNames/styles)
Placeholder->>Placeholder: 若 displayValues 非空 -> 早退 (不渲染)
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 分钟 Possibly related PRs
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1168 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 99.41% 99.41%
=======================================
Files 31 31
Lines 1191 1192 +1
Branches 420 400 -20
=======================================
+ Hits 1184 1185 +1
Misses 7 7 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request enhances the semantic structure of the BaseSelect component by introducing classNames and styles props for more granular customization of elements like items, content, and placeholders. The changes are consistently applied across the relevant components. It's great to see that you've also added a new test file to cover this new functionality. My feedback is focused on improving the setup of these new tests to ensure they are robust and maintainable.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
tests/semantic.test.tsx (2)
16-53: 建议移除未测试的 className 定义在此测试中，
classNames对象定义了clear、item、itemContent、itemRemove等属性（第 21、24-26 行），但这些在断言中并未被验证。这些样式在后续的专门测试中（第 94 行的 multiple mode 测试和第 138 行的 clear icon 测试）才会被测试。为了提高测试的清晰度和可维护性，建议只保留在当前测试中实际验证的 className 定义。
应用此 diff 来简化 classNames 对象：
it('should apply semantic classNames correctly', () => { const classNames = { prefix: 'custom-prefix', suffix: 'custom-suffix', input: 'custom-input', - clear: 'custom-clear', placeholder: 'custom-placeholder', content: 'custom-content', - item: 'custom-item', - itemContent: 'custom-item-content', - itemRemove: 'custom-item-remove', };
55-92: 建议移除未测试的 style 定义与第一个测试类似，此测试的
styles对象定义了clear、item、itemContent、itemRemove等属性（第 60、63-65 行），但在断言中并未被验证。这些样式在后续的专门测试中才会被测试。为了保持测试的简洁性，建议只保留在当前测试中实际验证的 style 定义。
应用此 diff 来简化 styles 对象：
it('should apply semantic styles correctly', () => { const styles = { prefix: { color: 'red' }, suffix: { color: 'blue' }, input: { fontSize: '16px' }, - clear: { cursor: 'pointer' }, placeholder: { opacity: 0.6 }, content: { padding: '4px' }, - item: { margin: '2px' }, - itemContent: { fontWeight: 'bold' }, - itemRemove: { background: 'transparent' }, };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
tests/semantic.test.tsx(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
tests/semantic.test.tsx (3)
1-14: 测试设置结构合理导入语句和 defaultProps 配置看起来是合理的，为测试提供了必要的基础设置。
94-136: LGTM!此测试正确验证了多选模式下的 item 相关语义样式（item、itemContent、itemRemove），测试覆盖了 className 和 style 两个方面，逻辑清晰且完整。
138-161: LGTM!此测试正确验证了启用
allowClear时清除图标的语义样式，通过提供 value 确保清除图标可见，测试逻辑正确。
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit
发布说明