Skip to content

Conversation

robertmaynard
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Now that RAPIDS hasn't used CCCL < 2.8 for a couple of releases we can remove support for it

The big change is now the RAPIDS CCCL install layout matches the layout of an installed CCCL . Our previous difference was that we would install libcudacxx headers nested under a libcudacxx folder, which isn't required anymore

Checklist

  • I am familiar with the Contributing Guidelines.
  • New or existing tests cover these changes.
  • The documentation is up to date with these changes.
  • The cmake-format.json is up to date with these changes.

@robertmaynard robertmaynard requested a review from a team as a code owner June 5, 2025 14:02
@robertmaynard robertmaynard added feature request New feature or request non-breaking Introduces a non-breaking change 3 - Ready for Review Ready for review by team breaking Introduces a breaking change and removed non-breaking Introduces a non-breaking change labels Jun 5, 2025
@robertmaynard
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit 548e2f5 into rapidsai:branch-25.08 Jun 5, 2025
17 checks passed
@robertmaynard robertmaynard deleted the cccl_remove_support_for_older_versions branch June 24, 2025 16:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3 - Ready for Review Ready for review by team breaking Introduces a breaking change feature request New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants