Skip to content

Conversation

@jameslamb
Copy link
Member

Description

Contributes to rapidsai/build-planning#110

Proposes adding 2 types of validation on wheels in CI, to ensure we continue to produce wheels that are suitable for PyPI.

@jameslamb jameslamb changed the title WIP: [DO NOT MERGE] enforce wheel size limits, README formatting in CI enforce wheel size limits, README formatting in CI Nov 13, 2024
@jameslamb jameslamb requested a review from bdice November 13, 2024 17:05
@jameslamb jameslamb marked this pull request as ready for review November 13, 2024 17:05
@jameslamb jameslamb requested review from a team as code owners November 13, 2024 17:05
@jameslamb
Copy link
Member Author

/merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit fdb1180 into rapidsai:branch-24.12 Nov 14, 2024
55 checks passed
@jameslamb jameslamb deleted the wheel-validation branch November 14, 2024 03:32
rapids-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2024
`cuvs-cu11` wheels are significantly larger than `cuvs-cu12` wheels, because (among other reasons) they are not able to dynamically link to CUDA math library wheels.

In #464, I proposed a size limit for CI checks of "max CUDA 11 wheel size + a buffer".

This PR proposes using different thresholds based on CUDA major version, following these discussions:

* rapidsai/cugraph#4754 (comment)
* rapidsai/cuml#6136 (comment)

Authors:
  - James Lamb (https://github.com/jameslamb)

Approvers:
  - Mike Sarahan (https://github.com/msarahan)

URL: #469
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ci improvement Improves an existing functionality non-breaking Introduces a non-breaking change Python

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants