Skip to content

Conversation

kazuho
Copy link
Member

@kazuho kazuho commented Sep 17, 2025

Moves section 6.3 (Setting the Reordering Threshold Value) out of section 6 (Sending Acknowledgments) that talks about the behavior of the receiver, and places it alongside other sections that talks about the sender behavior.

closes #332.

unnecessarily sent before the packet can be declared lost. If the value is
larger, it can cause unnecessary delays in loss detection
({{Section 6.1.1 of QUIC-RECOVERY}}).

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
In order to avoid unnecessary immediate acknowledgements, senders SHOULD implement adaptive packet threshold loss detection and communicate the increased Reordering Threshold value to the receiver.

@ianswett I've borrowed the text from #322 (comment); WDYT?

Copy link

@MarcoPolo MarcoPolo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed that this spot makes more sense, and I prefer this spot over placing this in section 4 (as mentioned in #332).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Section 6.3 is not about "Sending Acknowledgments"
2 participants