Skip to content

Conversation

mkouba
Copy link
Contributor

@mkouba mkouba commented Apr 24, 2025

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

@mkouba mkouba force-pushed the issue-34315 branch 2 times, most recently from 77f300c to 535479d Compare April 28, 2025 08:04
@mkouba mkouba requested a review from ia3andy April 28, 2025 08:05

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 28, 2025

🙈 The PR is closed and the preview is expired.

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

@ia3andy ia3andy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should work as parameters too?

@mkouba
Copy link
Contributor Author

mkouba commented Apr 28, 2025

This should work as parameters too?

You mean as params of a virtual method call? Yes, that should work as well.

@ia3andy
Copy link
Contributor

ia3andy commented Apr 28, 2025

This should work as parameters too?

You mean as params of a virtual method call? Yes, that should work as well.

No test for this?

@mkouba
Copy link
Contributor Author

mkouba commented Apr 28, 2025

This should work as parameters too?

You mean as params of a virtual method call? Yes, that should work as well.

No test for this?

Nope, but of course I can add some ;-).

@mkouba
Copy link
Contributor Author

mkouba commented Apr 28, 2025

This should work as parameters too?

You mean as params of a virtual method call? Yes, that should work as well.

No test for this?

Nope, but of course I can add some ;-).

Done.

@mkouba mkouba requested a review from ia3andy April 28, 2025 15:43
Copy link

quarkus-bot bot commented Apr 28, 2025

Status for workflow Quarkus Documentation CI

This is the status report for running Quarkus Documentation CI on commit c0fe20d.

✅ The latest workflow run for the pull request has completed successfully.

It should be safe to merge provided you have a look at the other checks in the summary.

Warning

There are other workflow runs running, you probably need to wait for their status before merging.

Copy link

quarkus-bot bot commented Apr 28, 2025

Status for workflow Quarkus CI

This is the status report for running Quarkus CI on commit c0fe20d.

✅ The latest workflow run for the pull request has completed successfully.

It should be safe to merge provided you have a look at the other checks in the summary.

You can consult the Develocity build scans.


Flaky tests - Develocity

⚙️ Maven Tests - JDK 17

📦 integration-tests/devmode

io.quarkus.test.devui.DevUIGrpcSmokeTest.testTestService - History

  • Too many recursions, message not returned for id [1667441767] - java.lang.RuntimeException
java.lang.RuntimeException: Too many recursions, message not returned for id [1667441767]
	at io.quarkus.devui.tests.DevUIJsonRPCTest.objectResultFromJsonRPC(DevUIJsonRPCTest.java:164)
	at io.quarkus.devui.tests.DevUIJsonRPCTest.objectResultFromJsonRPC(DevUIJsonRPCTest.java:167)
	at io.quarkus.devui.tests.DevUIJsonRPCTest.objectResultFromJsonRPC(DevUIJsonRPCTest.java:167)
	at io.quarkus.devui.tests.DevUIJsonRPCTest.objectResultFromJsonRPC(DevUIJsonRPCTest.java:167)
	at io.quarkus.devui.tests.DevUIJsonRPCTest.objectResultFromJsonRPC(DevUIJsonRPCTest.java:167)
	at io.quarkus.devui.tests.DevUIJsonRPCTest.objectResultFromJsonRPC(DevUIJsonRPCTest.java:167)
	at io.quarkus.devui.tests.DevUIJsonRPCTest.objectResultFromJsonRPC(DevUIJsonRPCTest.java:167)

@mkouba
Copy link
Contributor Author

mkouba commented Apr 29, 2025

@ia3andy I think that the DevUIGrpcSmokeTest#testTestService() is flaky and unrelated.

Copy link
Contributor

@ia3andy ia3andy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mkouba mkouba merged commit 74d7d69 into quarkusio:main Apr 30, 2025
60 checks passed
@quarkus-bot quarkus-bot bot added this to the 3.23 - main milestone Apr 30, 2025
@quarkus-bot quarkus-bot bot added the kind/enhancement New feature or request label Apr 30, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support ternary operator in expression

2 participants