Skip to content

Conversation

geoand
Copy link
Contributor

@geoand geoand commented Apr 4, 2025

geoand added 2 commits April 4, 2025 16:04
When we moved to the inline mocks, clearing
the mocks was done incorrectly.

Fixes: quarkusio#47179
Copy link

quarkus-bot bot commented Apr 4, 2025

Status for workflow Quarkus CI

This is the status report for running Quarkus CI on commit dd998af.

✅ The latest workflow run for the pull request has completed successfully.

It should be safe to merge provided you have a look at the other checks in the summary.

You can consult the Develocity build scans.

@gsmet gsmet merged commit 83f8ebe into quarkusio:main Apr 4, 2025
32 checks passed
@quarkus-bot quarkus-bot bot added this to the 3.22 - main milestone Apr 4, 2025
@geoand geoand deleted the #47179 branch April 4, 2025 13:37
geoand added a commit to geoand/quarkus that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2025
@geoand
Copy link
Contributor Author

geoand commented Apr 7, 2025

#47214 will also have to be backported if this one is

@gsmet gsmet modified the milestones: 3.22 - main, 3.21.2 Apr 8, 2025
gsmet pushed a commit to gsmet/quarkus that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2025
Follows up on: quarkusio#47181

(cherry picked from commit 144c99e)
junes189 pushed a commit to junes189/quarkus that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2025
DavideD pushed a commit to DavideD/quarkus that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2025
@jmartisk jmartisk modified the milestones: 3.21.2, 3.20.1 Apr 30, 2025
jmartisk pushed a commit to jmartisk/quarkus that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2025
Follows up on: quarkusio#47181

(cherry picked from commit 144c99e)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Since Quarkus 3.19 quarkus-junit5-mockito doesn't clean up mocks properly when used in combination with @TestInstance(TestInstance.Lifecycle.PER_CLASS)

3 participants