-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 309
Fix float multiple_of
validation for negative numbers
#1373
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
davidhewitt
merged 5 commits into
pydantic:main
from
K-dash:improve-float-multiple-of-validation
Feb 5, 2025
+64
−23
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3432e82
Improve precision of float multiple_of validation
K-dash 8e9b338
Add equivalent decimal tests for consistency
K-dash 9bcf5fc
Update Cargo.lock
K-dash 7cface5
Merge branch 'main' of https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic-core into…
K-dash cc53124
fix: resolve multiple_of validation bug for negative floats using rou…
K-dash File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -108,9 +108,23 @@ impl Validator for ConstrainedFloatValidator { | |
return Err(ValError::new(ErrorTypeDefaults::FiniteNumber, input)); | ||
} | ||
if let Some(multiple_of) = self.multiple_of { | ||
let rem = float % multiple_of; | ||
let threshold = float.abs() / 1e9; | ||
if rem.abs() > threshold && (rem - multiple_of).abs() > threshold { | ||
const EPSILON_FACTOR: f64 = 100.0; | ||
let epsilon_threshold = f64::EPSILON * EPSILON_FACTOR; | ||
|
||
// Round the result of dividing the input value by the multiple | ||
let rounded = (float / multiple_of).round(); | ||
|
||
// Calculate the difference between the rounded value and the original value | ||
let diff = (float - rounded * multiple_of).abs(); | ||
|
||
// Calculate the relative error (avoid division by zero) | ||
let relative_error = if float != 0.0 { diff / float.abs() } else { 0.0 }; | ||
|
||
// Threshold (considering both relative and absolute error) | ||
let threshold = epsilon_threshold.max(multiple_of * epsilon_threshold); | ||
|
||
|
||
// Check if the difference exceeds the threshold and the relative error is significant | ||
if diff > threshold && relative_error > epsilon_threshold { | ||
|
||
return Err(ValError::new( | ||
ErrorType::MultipleOf { | ||
multiple_of: multiple_of.into(), | ||
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It feels to me like given we evaluate
threshold
in units ofmultiple_of
, we might want to do similarly here to end up with same scale ofmultiple_of
(by dividing through byrounded
)?