Skip to content

Conversation

@ogrisel
Copy link
Collaborator

@ogrisel ogrisel commented Aug 17, 2025

Here are suggested improvements based on my review of the first imbalance classification notebook.

@glemaitre glemaitre self-requested a review August 17, 2025 13:09
@glemaitre glemaitre marked this pull request as ready for review August 18, 2025 11:42
@glemaitre glemaitre merged commit 21c44e5 into main Aug 18, 2025
3 checks passed
@ogrisel ogrisel deleted the imbalance-review branch August 18, 2025 11:45
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2025
* Phrasing in intro

* Phrasing / placeholder for exercise

* Fix matplotlib import for jupyterlite

* Improve phrasing for the strictly proper scoring rule intro

* Phrasing in the decision thresholding section

* More phrasing improvements

* More phrasing improvements

* Improve phrasing and explanations for degenerate predictions

* Use a different variable name for the resampling model + fix placeholders

* Reframe the practical setting for the decision cutoff, fix one more placeholder and add conclusion

* Grammar

* Z -> z

---------

Co-authored-by: Guillaume Lemaitre <[email protected]> 21c44e5
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants