Skip to content

StateLabel: Add open and closed states for no icon cases #5803

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Mar 31, 2025

Conversation

broccolinisoup
Copy link
Member

@broccolinisoup broccolinisoup commented Mar 21, 2025

For milestone open and closes states, we need a variant of the StateLabel without an icon. After talking (GitHub staff only link) with @mperrotti and @emilybrick, they gave me a 👍🏻 to add two new states open and closed for cases that do not need/have an icon.

Changelog

New

  • Add open state
  • Add closed state

Changed

Removed

Rollout strategy

  • Patch release
  • Minor release
  • Major release; if selected, include a written rollout or migration plan
  • None; if selected, include a brief description as to why

Testing & Reviewing

Merge checklist

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Mar 21, 2025

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 65160e3

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
@primer/react Minor

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@github-actions github-actions bot added the staff Author is a staff member label Mar 21, 2025
@broccolinisoup broccolinisoup changed the title StateLabel: Add open and closed states for no icon cases StateLabel: Add open and closed states for no icon cases Mar 21, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the integration-tests: recommended This change needs to be tested for breaking changes. See https://arc.net/l/quote/tdmpakpm label Mar 21, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

👋 Hi, this pull request contains changes to the source code that github/github depends on. If you are GitHub staff, we recommend testing these changes with github/github using the integration workflow. Thanks!

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 21, 2025

size-limit report 📦

Path Size
packages/react/dist/browser.esm.js 105.65 KB (+0.09% 🔺)
packages/react/dist/browser.umd.js 105.92 KB (-0.01% 🔽)

@github-actions github-actions bot requested a deployment to storybook-preview-5803 March 21, 2025 04:40 Abandoned
@@ -19,6 +20,14 @@ export const PullMerged = () => <StateLabel status="pullMerged">Merged</StateLab
export const Queued = () => <StateLabel status="pullQueued">Queued</StateLabel>
export const Draft = () => <StateLabel status="draft">Draft</StateLabel>
export const Unavailable = () => <StateLabel status="unavailable">Unavailable</StateLabel>
export const Open = () => (
<StateLabel status="open">
{/* Because open is a generic status, a visually hidden text could be added to specify the type of the artifact */}
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is optional - I am happy to remove it if you think it is unnecessary or confusing.

@joshblack
Copy link
Member

@broccolinisoup
Copy link
Member Author

@broccolinisoup seems like the AAT failures are coming from color contrast: https://primer-d5758f4231-13348165.drafts.github.io/aat-no-flag/#?testId=9a7338b81aa38bfd83ad-792f1d5d04241e89b7e1&q=s:failed 👀

Thanks @joshblack !! I added the "open" story to color contrast skip list.

@github-actions github-actions bot requested a deployment to storybook-preview-5803 March 25, 2025 10:13 Abandoned
@broccolinisoup broccolinisoup added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 25, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot temporarily deployed to storybook-preview-5803 March 25, 2025 10:28 Inactive
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Mar 25, 2025
@joshblack
Copy link
Member

@broccolinisoup just wanted to double-check, is that story expected to fail contrast checks?

@broccolinisoup
Copy link
Member Author

@broccolinisoup just wanted to double-check, is that story expected to fail contrast checks?

@joshblack I believe so—at least if the issueOpened variant is still expected to fail the contrast check. The new open status uses the same colors as issueOpened, just without an icon. Let me know if I’m missing anything.

@joshblack joshblack added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 31, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 9c135c4 Mar 31, 2025
44 checks passed
@joshblack joshblack deleted the broccolinisoup/state-label-open-closed branch March 31, 2025 17:08
@primer primer bot mentioned this pull request Mar 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integration-tests: recommended This change needs to be tested for breaking changes. See https://arc.net/l/quote/tdmpakpm staff Author is a staff member
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants