Skip to content

Conversation

nndn
Copy link
Contributor

@nndn nndn commented Aug 29, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Relaxed dependency constraint for python-multipart from an exact pin to a minimum version (now requires python-multipart >= 0.0.7). This allows installation of newer releases, improving compatibility with upstream updates and enabling receipt of ongoing fixes and improvements without manual intervention. All other dependencies remain unchanged.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 29, 2025

Walkthrough

Relaxed the dependency constraint in requirements.txt by changing python-multipart from an exact pin (==0.0.6) to a minimum version (>=0.0.7). No other files or declarations were modified.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary of Changes
Dependencies
requirements.txt
Updated dependency specifier: python-multipart==0.0.6python-multipart>=0.0.7. No other lines changed.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

I nibbled a pin to set it free,
From 0.0.6 to “0.0.7 and up,” you see.
A hop through versions, light and neat,
Dependencies fresh, carrots complete.
Thump-thump—constraints eased with glee!

Tip

🔌 Remote MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available!

Pro plan users can now connect to remote MCP servers from the Integrations page. Connect with popular remote MCPs such as Notion and Linear to add more context to your reviews and chats.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix-requirements

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbit in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbit in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbit gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbit read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbit help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbit ignore or @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbit summary or @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbit or @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@nndn nndn requested a review from dhirenmathur August 29, 2025 05:13
Copy link

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4dee6fe and 907cf8a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • requirements.txt (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
requirements.txt (1)

72-72: Pin python-multipart to the first patched release with an upper bound
If this bump from 0.0.6 is security-driven, change

- python-multipart>=0.0.7
+ python-multipart>=0.0.7,<0.0.8

and lock it in your constraints (e.g. constraints.txt/poetry.lock) for deterministic deploys. Confirm via an audit tool or advisory data that 0.0.7 is indeed the first non-vulnerable release.

@@ -69,4 +69,4 @@ pathspec==0.12.1
pytest
pytest-asyncio
Pillow==10.0.1
python-multipart==0.0.6
python-multipart>=0.0.7
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Avoid unbounded upgrades; cap the upper version.

Relaxing to a bare minimum risks surprise breaks when new releases land. Add an upper bound aligned with 0.x semantics.

-python-multipart>=0.0.7
+python-multipart>=0.0.7,<0.1.0
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
python-multipart>=0.0.7
python-multipart>=0.0.7,<0.1.0
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In requirements.txt at line 72, the dependency python-multipart is currently
unbounded (python-multipart>=0.0.7); restrict it to avoid unexpected breaking
changes by adding an upper bound consistent with 0.x semver (for example change
to python-multipart>=0.0.7,<0.1.0) so pip will accept bugfixes and minor deltas
but block incompatible 0.1.x releases.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Confirm compatibility with FastAPI’s extras and our usage.

fastapi[all]==0.115.6 already pulls python-multipart. Ensure the widened range doesn’t drift beyond what FastAPI supports and doesn’t break our UploadFile/Form handlers.

Run:

If FastAPI’s own constraints differ, align our cap accordingly.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Identify multipart usage
rg -n -C2 -P '\b(UploadFile|File|Form)\b' --type=py

# Resolve what version would install from a clean env
python -m venv .venv && . .venv/bin/activate
pip install --upgrade pip
pip install "fastapi[all]==0.115.6" "python-multipart>=0.0.7,<0.1.0" 2>/dev/null
python - <<'PY'
import pkg_resources as pr
for name in ["fastapi","starlette","python-multipart"]:
    d=pr.get_distribution(name); print(name, d.version)
PY

Length of output: 25220


requirements.txt: add <0.1.0 upper bound to python-multipart
Ensures we match FastAPI 0.115.6’s own python-multipart<0.1.0,>=0.0.7 constraint and prevent future major-version breaks in our UploadFile/Form handlers.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In requirements.txt at line 72, the python-multipart pin is missing the upper
bound that FastAPI requires; change the requirement from
"python-multipart>=0.0.7" to "python-multipart>=0.0.7,<0.1.0" so we match
FastAPI 0.115.6's constraint and avoid future breaking major versions for
UploadFile/Form handlers.

@dhirenmathur dhirenmathur merged commit 6df7b38 into main Aug 29, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants