-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
⚠ Remove TLSVerify/PullSecret fields #369
⚠ Remove TLSVerify/PullSecret fields #369
Conversation
|
I am working on switching We are also planning to port similar logic to I bring this up because there will be a way to inject pull secrets and insecure registry configurations to resolve the e2e issues (e.g. by mounting a configmap that contains the analogous configuration files for insecure registries and credentials) |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #369 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 34.41% 34.48% +0.07%
==========================================
Files 17 17
Lines 738 722 -16
==========================================
- Hits 254 249 -5
+ Misses 452 443 -9
+ Partials 32 30 -2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
@joelanford There was also changes to the way the e2es are configured in operator-controller recently that we might be able to update catalogd to follow. IIRC the changes in operator-controller made it so that we didn't need to skip TLS verification (since there is no way to set that in the |
|
Trying to just get the TLS/Cert changes from operator-controller in, before continuing here: |
|
PR to trust certs from image-registry: (Needs to be merged before and this rebased on top) |
182a8ac to
093582b
Compare
093582b to
26e7e4d
Compare
|
@thetechnick I've taken the liberty of rebasing your PR (please double check that my conflict resolution was what you had in mind =D) |
Remove fields that will not have long term support committed to them to prepare for the v1.0 release. Removed Fields: - spec.source.image.insecureSkipTLSVerify - spec.source.image.pullSecret GH Issue Ref: operator-framework#355 Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <[email protected]>
26e7e4d to
c6303d6
Compare
perdasilva
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
Remove fields that will not have long term support committed to them to prepare for the v1.0 release.
Removed Fields:
GH Issue Ref: #355
Draft due to pending e2e test changes.