Skip to content

(fix) Adds missing featureName from ComponentContext #70

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 18, 2024
Merged

(fix) Adds missing featureName from ComponentContext #70

merged 1 commit into from
May 18, 2024

Conversation

pirupius
Copy link
Member

@pirupius pirupius commented May 18, 2024 •
edited by denniskigen
Loading

Requirements

  • This PR has a title that briefly describes the work done including the ticket number. If there is a ticket, make sure your PR title includes a conventional commit label. See existing PR titles for inspiration.
  • My work conforms to the OpenMRS 3.0 Styleguide and design documentation.
  • My work includes tests or is validated by existing tests.

Summary

Updates ComponentContext to include featureName

Screenshots

Related Issue

Other

denniskigen
denniskigen approved these changes May 18, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@denniskigen denniskigen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@denniskigen denniskigen merged commit 0f7af43 into main May 18, 2024
@denniskigen denniskigen deleted the fix/add-missing-featureName-from-componentContext branch May 18, 2024 19:42
@denniskigen
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@denniskigen denniskigen denniskigen approved these changes

@samuelmale samuelmale Awaiting requested review from samuelmale

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@pirupius @denniskigen