Skip to content

Conversation

@dhaiducek
Copy link
Member

When a ConfigurationPolicy manifest was provided directly, extraDependencies was being set at the objectDefinition level rather than the policy-templates level.

ref: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ACM-7353

When a `ConfigurationPolicy` manifest was provided directly,
`extraDependencies` was being set at the `objectDefinition` level
rather than the `policy-templates` level.

ref: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ACM-7353
Signed-off-by: Dale Haiducek <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 7, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dhaiducek, mprahl

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

// Only set dependency options if it's an OCM policy
if isOcmPolicy {
setTemplateOptions(manifest, ignorePending, extraDeps)
setTemplateOptions(policyTemplate, ignorePending, extraDeps)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So, it was a one word change? Awesome! 😆

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants