-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 102
Add a quoting API inspired by Ppx_deriving #95
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
This PR introduces a hygiene API in the spirit of Ppx_deriving.quoter. The main differences are: * We can't use metaquot * There are no optional arguments * We don't wrap stuff with modules as this can be easily handled separately Signed-off-by: Rudi Grinberg <[email protected]>
It seems like I'm unable to |
Not sure about the install_printer problem. We should switch all these tests to ppx_expect at some point anyway |
Signed-off-by: Rudi Grinberg <[email protected]>
I've written up some docs. Shall I rename the module to |
Signed-off-by: Jeremie Dimino <[email protected]>
|
Signed-off-by: Rudi Grinberg <[email protected]>
@diml I renamed it. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, looks good to merge!
And for people who might be watching this PR: we are adding this module to make it easier to port plugins from |
Thanks for the review, I'll prepare a corresponding PR to ppx. |
This PR introduces a hygiene API in the spirit of Ppx_deriving.quoter.
The main differences are:
separately